bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Settlement Between the FTC and Kochava Defines Sensitive Location Data

May 16, 2026

Report from AdExchanger
In Brief – The Federal Trade Commission announced a settlement with data broker Kochava over allegations that the firm engaged in unfair competition by improperly collecting and selling precise geolocation data from hundreds of millions of mobile devices. Under the proposed settlement Kochava is barred from selling or disclosing sensitive location data unless consumers provide explicit consent and the information is used for a service directly requested by the user. “Sensitive Locations” are defined as medical facilities, religious organizations, education or childcare services, temporary shelters or social services to homeless people or survivors of domestic violence, or installations related to the military or federal law enforcement. The agreement also requires the company to establish a comprehensive sensitive-location data compliance program, including an ability for consumers to withdraw consent.

Context – In terms of macro digital policy signals, slot this settlement in with other Trump Administration efforts rejecting progressive priorities while still trying to retain a populist, sometimes anti-tech regulatory perspective. The original FTC lawsuit, filed just a few months after the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision, was seen as Lina Khan’s FTC making good on a Biden Administration pledge to protect access to reproductive health care following the High Court’s abortion ruling. The settlement closing the case sets firm requirements around user consent related to sensitive location data, but there is no mention of reproductive health in the settlement or related materials, just health care in general. Judge Lynn Winmill, who must still approve the settlement, rejected the first FTC complaint but eventually ruled that the sale of granular and non-anonymized location data could expose consumers “to significant risks of secondary harms” and therefore could be judged an “unfair” trade practice Under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Act. Kochava settled a parallel consumer class action lawsuit more than a year ago that included similar privacy practices and was approved by Judge Winmill.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
EU Commission Accepts X’s Plan to Address DSA Transparency Concerns

Report from MediaPost In Brief – The European Commission has announced the approval of X’s plan to address several Digital Services Act (DSA) compliance shortcomings identified by the regulator. The decision follows the €120 million fine imposed on the social media...

TikTok’s Latest EU DSA Charges Allege Failing to Protect Minors

Report from Reuters In Brief – TikTok faces fresh allegations from the European Commission that its platform design violates the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA) by failing to adequately protect minors. The preliminary findings mark the fourth DSA case opened against...

New Jersey Bans So-Called “Surveillance Pricing” for Groceries

Report from NJ.Com In Brief – New Jersey Gov. Mikie Sherrill (D) has signed the Fair Price Protection Act, banning grocery stores and third-party grocery delivery platforms from using consumers' personal data to set or vary food prices. Sherrill said the measure will...

France Officially Sets 15-Year-Old Age Threshold for Social Media

Report from the New York Times In Brief – France has become the first European country to fully approve a nationwide ban on social media for children under 15, with the law expected to take effect as early as Sept. 1. Passed by large majorities in both houses of the...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required