bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Settlement Between the FTC and Kochava Defines Sensitive Location Data

May 16, 2026

Report from AdExchanger
In Brief – The Federal Trade Commission announced a settlement with data broker Kochava over allegations that the firm engaged in unfair competition by improperly collecting and selling precise geolocation data from hundreds of millions of mobile devices. Under the proposed settlement Kochava is barred from selling or disclosing sensitive location data unless consumers provide explicit consent and the information is used for a service directly requested by the user. “Sensitive Locations” are defined as medical facilities, religious organizations, education or childcare services, temporary shelters or social services to homeless people or survivors of domestic violence, or installations related to the military or federal law enforcement. The agreement also requires the company to establish a comprehensive sensitive-location data compliance program, including an ability for consumers to withdraw consent.

Context – In terms of macro digital policy signals, slot this settlement in with other Trump Administration efforts rejecting progressive priorities while still trying to retain a populist, sometimes anti-tech regulatory perspective. The original FTC lawsuit, filed just a few months after the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision, was seen as Lina Khan’s FTC making good on a Biden Administration pledge to protect access to reproductive health care following the High Court’s abortion ruling. The settlement closing the case sets firm requirements around user consent related to sensitive location data, but there is no mention of reproductive health in the settlement or related materials, just health care in general. Judge Lynn Winmill, who must still approve the settlement, rejected the first FTC complaint but eventually ruled that the sale of granular and non-anonymized location data could expose consumers “to significant risks of secondary harms” and therefore could be judged an “unfair” trade practice Under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Act. Kochava settled a parallel consumer class action lawsuit more than a year ago that included similar privacy practices and was approved by Judge Winmill.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
European Commission Issues AI Content Notification Rules

Report from MediaPost In Brief – The AI transparency rules required by Article 50 of the EU’s AI Act have taken effect, requiring companies to clearly disclose when users are interacting with artificial intelligence or viewing AI-generated or manipulated images, audio...

More Follow-On Lawsuits for Google Likely After Latest DMA Fine

Report from Reuters In Brief – European lawyers and litigation financiers say that the European Commission’s recent decision to fine Google $1 billion for violating the Digital Markets Act (DMA) may add to the wave of private antitrust lawsuits that the search giant...

More Really Smart Tech People Call for International AI Governance

Report from the Washington Post In Brief – OpenAI and Anthropic have endorsed a petition urging the US government to help create an international regime to slow down and regulate the pace of “automated AI development.” It is signed by over 1,200 “employees of frontier...

Judge Dismisses Google’s DMCA Search Scraping Lawsuit

Report from MediaPost In Brief – Federal District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers has dismissed Google's complaint against the Texas-based company SerpApi for allegedly violating the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) anti-circumvention provisions by evading...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required