bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

State AGs Rally Around Colorado Social Media Warning Label Law

Jun 5, 2026

Report from MediaPost
In Brief – A coalition of 42 State Attorneys General are backing Colorado’s appeal to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals to allow the state to enforce its new law requiring social media platforms to display cigarette-style health warnings to young users. The AG’s amicus brief argues that social media can be highly addictive and is linked to harms such as depression and suicidal thoughts among minors. Colorado’s HB24-1136 requires that platforms either provide educational information about social media’s effects on adolescent brain development and mental health or issue pop-up warnings every 30 minutes after minors exceed one hour of daily use or use platforms late at night. A federal judge blocked enforcement of the law last November, ruling that NetChoice, a digital platform trade group, was likely to prevail in its legal challenge arguing that the law violates the First Amendment by forcing companies to promote a disputed view about social media harms.

Context – Social media critics in the US have been engaged in a massive campaign of civil litigation and state legislation to force the platforms to change how they operate. Because Sec. 230 protects online platforms from liability for content posted by users and platform decisions whether to restrict objectionable content, critics have focused on allegations that platforms employ so-called addictive features that harm younger users. States keep passing laws regulating platform features and operations. For example, CaliforniaNew York and Minnesota have passed warning label laws like Colorado’s. Most of the state laws have been blocked by federal judges. However, last year, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, and then the 11th Circuit, overruled district judges and allowed Mississippi and Florida social media laws to go into effect. An eventual High Court clash is likely. A wave of civil lawsuits is proving more successful in court, with a recent plaintiff wins in California state court and federal court in New Mexico, and the subsequent agreement by the largest social media platforms to settle the federal lawsuit of a rural Kentucky school district rather than face off in federal court in California. Thousands more are in the queue.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
Yelp Wins Legal Ruling in Antitrust Battle with Google

Report from Courthouse News Service In Brief – Federal Magistrate Judge Susan Van Keulen has ruled that Yelp, a leading internet company critic of Google’s search practices, can rely on District Judge Amit Mehta’s 2024 decision in the Justice Department’s landmark...

Illinois Governor Signs Robust AI “Safety” Law

Report from CBS News In Brief – Illinois Governor JB Pritzker (D) has signed the AI Safety Measures Act into law pushing the state to the forefront of AI regulation. The law imposes “safety” requirements on companies developing so-called frontier AI models, including...

Japan Moving to Regulate Social Media and AI in Election Campaigns

Report from Nippon.com In Brief – Japan's House of Representatives, the lower chamber of the Diet, has approved two bills by a majority vote that are intended to address the misuse of social media during election campaigns. The bills, which must next be considered by...

UK CMA Joins the Apple and Google App Store Global Regulation Parade

Report from Reuters In Brief – Britain’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has announced its proposed new regulations to require Apple’s and Google’s app stores to allow app developers to direct users to third-party payment options to increase competition and...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required