Home
Ask A Question!
AskAQuestion@platformeconomyinsight.com
News & Insights
Dutch Regulator Opens Digital Services Act Investigation of Roblox
Report from NL Times
In Brief – The Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) has launched a formal Digital Services Act (DSA) investigation of Roblox over concerns that the online gaming platform may not be doing enough to protect children. The DSA requires platforms to take appropriate measures to safeguard minors’ privacy, safety, and security. The regulator said it has received multiple reports about risks faced by minors on the platform, including allegations that it has been used for child sexual grooming and that the platform employs “dark patterns” that may improperly encourage children to make in-game purchases. The ACM investigation is being undertaken under its authority as the country’s Digital Services Coordinator (DSC) which has lead DSA enforcement authority for digital platforms based in the Netherlands.
Context – The DSA regulates how digital platforms address objectionable material, imposing the strictest duties on the largest platforms, those with 45 million monthly active users in the EU, which are designated as Very Large Online Platforms (VLOPs). The European Commission is the lead DSA enforcer for the VLOPs, which now number 25, with six active investigations covering 13 platforms, including X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Temu. DSA oversight of other platforms is led by the Digital Services Coordinator where a platform is based. Roblox claims 38 million monthly active users in Europe and its EU establishment is in the Netherlands. In the face of harsh criticism, Roblox launched several safety measures last year, including barring users under the age of 13 from sending direct messages and announcing technical age verification to back up their age-based rules. The Roblox age verification processes reportedly have had a somewhat rocky roll-out. Several US State Attorneys General have filed civil lawsuits against the company for harming young users, while online safety regulators in Australia and the UK have directed the company to employ technical age verification in those countries.
EU Commission Moves to Stop Meta from Banning Chatbots on WhatsApp
Report from Wall Street Journal
In Brief – The European Commission has informed Meta that it plans to block the company’s ban on third-party AI chatbots from operating over WhatsApp. The antitrust regulator has reached a preliminary finding that Meta’s policy could unlawfully leverage its dominant position in messaging apps to gain an unfair advantage in emerging AI chatbot markets. Competition Commissioner Teresa Ribera said swift action is needed because AI markets are evolving rapidly and the WhatsApp policy could cause lasting harm to AI chatbot competition in Europe. The interim measures would require Meta to maintain third-party AI assistants’ access to WhatsApp’s Business API under the terms that existed before the company announced changes to the WhatsApp Business Solution Terms in October that effectively banned general-purpose third-party AI chatbots assistants starting in January. Meta has repeatedly rejected arguments that WhatsApp’s Business API is a key distribution channel for AI chatbots, noting that consumers have many alternative ways to access them.
Context – Regulators who are sympathetic to chatbot operator complaints highlight WhatsApp’s strong position in the market for messaging apps, while Meta argues that its chatbots hold very small shares of the AI chatbot market. For example, Chat-GPT has approximately an 80% market share in the EU and it is even higher in Brazil, while Meta’s chatbots market shares barely register. The European Commission was the first regulator to act, opening an antitrust investigation in early December. In late December, the Italian competition watchdog ordered Meta to suspend their policy in Italy while it carried out an antitrust investigation. In mid-January the Brazilian regulator did the same. In Brazil, a court quickly overturned the regulator’s order. In Italy, Meta announced that it will charge AI companies a per message fee for running their chatbots on WhatsApp in regions where regulators force the company to allow chatbots. WhatsApp currently charges companies for using its API for various template responses to customers.
Department of Justice and State AGs Appeal Google Search Remedies Order
Report from Bloomberg
In Brief – The US Department of Justice has announced that it notified the Federal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia that it will appeal US District Judge Amit Mehta’s remedies order in the federal antitrust lawsuit that found Google engaged in illegal anti-competitive conduct to maintain and grow their monopoly in internet search and search-related online ads. Judge Mehta’s initial 2024 ruling, which focused on Google’s payments to device giants Apple and Samsung, was a win in the Big Tech antitrust litigation campaign that began in 2020. However, the judge’s remedies order, which eschewed the harshest requests from the plaintiffs, including the call to force Google to divest its Chrome browser, was seen as a result in Google’s favor. Mehta, who said that in his ruling that “courts must approach the task of crafting remedies with a healthy dose of humility,” barred Google from entering exclusive distribution agreements for Google Search, Chrome, Google Assistant, and its Gemini app for six years, and requires the company to share certain search data and syndicated search results and ads with qualified competitors. Google has also appealed Mehta’s order.
Context – Judge Mehta’s remedies order was the first decent result for Google in an antitrust case in a couple of years. The rapid pace of technological change, particularly the rise of generative AI, was called out by Mehta who said that the new technologies “give the court hope that Google will not simply outbid competitors for distribution if superior products emerge.” Similarly, two months after Mehta’s remedies order, District Judge James Boasberg ruled that the Federal Trade Commission and State AGs failed to show that Meta currently holds a social media monopoly in the face of emergent giants including YouTube and TikTok. That decision is also being appealed. Finally, a remedies ruling is expected soon from District Judge Leonie Brinkema following Google’s AdTech antitrust trial loss, and in the EU and UK, Google is simply facing direct government regulation of their search business.
France Pushing Digital Sovereignty Directing Ministries Off Zoom and Teams
Report from ZDNET
In Brief – French Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu has directed all French government officials and civil servants to stop using American-owned video conference software such as Teams and Zoom by 2027 in favor of a new French-made application called Visio. The policy is part of France’s “digital sovereignty” strategy to reduce reliance on foreign software providers and gain greater control over critical digital infrastructure. Visio, in testing for a year and currently with about 40,000 users, is part of France’s “Suite Numérique,” a sovereign digital ecosystem designed to replace tools such as Gmail and Slack for civil servants. The video conference application includes AI-powered meeting transcription and speaker identification developed by a French startup and is hosted on Outscale’s sovereign cloud infrastructure. Officials claim the switch could save up to €1 million annually per 100,000 users, while improving security, confidentiality, and resilience. Last July, the French Government instructed its officials to start using a government-designed messaging app, called “Tchap,” instead of foreign-owned messaging apps.
Context – The huge disruptions in US-EU relations that marked the entire first year of the second Trump presidency boosted European “digital sovereignty” efforts and the rapid escalation of January’s Greenland crisis put an exclamation point on those concerns. In March, nearly 100 European companies and trade groups signed a letter called on the EU Commission to take “radical action” for Europe to become more technologically independent. The year closed with France and Germany co-hosting a Summit on European Digital Sovereignty where French President Emmanuel Macron said that Europe must not be a “client” of outside tech providers or a “vassal” to the US or China. The Eurostack Initiative details actions to promote European offerings across the digital ecosystem, including chips, computing, applications, and AI. Meanwhile, taxes and regulatory limits on US tech companies will likely impact European business and consumer customers of successful digital services by imposing higher costs or degrading services.
Governor Newsome Drops Funding for Media from California State Budget
Report from SFiST
In Brief – The latest budget proposal from California Governor Gavin Newsom (D) has eliminated funding for the News Transformation Fund, a state initiative to pay millions of dollars to California media companies. The fund was announced in 2024 as part of a deal to withdraw legislation aiming to force the largest online companies, especially Google and Meta, to pay California media companies when their content appeared on the platforms. Instead, Newsome, state legislators, and Google announced backing for a five-year plan that would provide $250 million to media companies. However, budget pressures quickly plagued the effort, with the state dropping its 2025 contribution to just $10 million, leading Google to do the same. Google responded to the latest state budget news that the company remains willing to match state funding.
Context – Media companies have been appealing to governments for nearly a decade to force Google and Meta to pay them when their content appears on the platforms. Australia, France, Spain and Canada have been especially responsive. California’s media funding plan was developed in response to the policy divergence of Google and Meta. When Canada enacted legislation in 2023 requiring the largest digital platforms to pay Canadian media companies, Google eventually complied while Meta refused to join the regime and instead blocked news uploads to their platforms in the country. The companies brought this divergence to the debate in California, with Google apparently in line to pay while Meta was prepared to block news media content. Accordingly, the deal for a public-private fund rather than a legal regime included Google but not Meta. In Australia, where both companies have made media payments since 2021, Meta announced plans to stop payments and the government responded with a new tax on large social media companies that won’t voluntarily pay Australian media companies. Lately, media company concerns over digital threats are far more focused on the implications of generative AI and both Google and Meta are exploring payments to publishers when their content is used in chatbot answers.
Spanish PM Announces Social Media Age Threshold Amidst Musk Tussle
Report from AP News
In Brief – Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has announced plans for a package of measures to regulate online companies, including banning teens under 16 from social media platforms that he called “a space of addiction, abuse, pornography, manipulation and violence.” Other proposals include making platform executives criminally liable for failing to remove illegal or hateful content, creating a new criminal offense for algorithmic manipulation and amplification of illegal material, and introducing a “hate and polarization footprint” system to measure how platforms fuel division. Sanchez called out Elon Musk’s platform X by name, claiming it “amplified disinformation” over his administration’s recent decision last week to grant legal status to 500,000 undocumented migrants. Musk responded saying, “Dirty Sanchez is a tyrant and a traitor to the people of Spain.”
Context – Spain may join the growing list of countries following Australia with an age limit for social media, but the harsh back and forth between Sanchez and Musk is about the billionaire’s proclivity to attack progressive politicians and back populist conservatives. He’s repeatedly been accused of election interference by European leaders including by French President Emanuel Macron, and French government prosecutors opened a criminal investigation of X last year targeting how the platform's recommendation algorithms deal with political issues. Those prosecutors recently expanded their probe and raided X’s Paris office. The Digital Services Act (DSA) is the EU law that regulates how digital platforms police illegal and objectionable content online, and the European Commission is the lead regulator for the largest platforms, which includes X. The Commission is engaged in several investigations of X, including how its algorithms handle politically sensitive content. The DSA’s backers say that the law protects free expression, but they also argue that law's regulation of “recommender systems" is different from regulating the content itself. Critics disagree. Regulating how social media, especially X, handles political content, is the most sensitive US-EU bilateral digital policy issue.
Big Trends
About PEI
Platform Economy Insights aims to provide small-to-mid-sized digital platform business leaders, investors and firms that support industry growth, and public officials, staff and media who track the platform economy, with expert analysis of public policy trends impacting the digital platform industry globally.
Executive Editor Brian Bieron and Senior Advisor Tod Cohen are recognized Internet, trade and platform policy leaders who have served as top global public policy experts to some of the Internet industry's leading platform businesses. They are now providing insights, analysis and reporting to wider audiences through a public policy platform that challenges the reach of all but the largest Internet industry public affairs teams.
Platform Economy Insights