bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Google Offers to Change Anti-Spam Policies to Appease EU Regulators

May 23, 2026

Report from Bloomberg
In Brief – Google has reportedly made a proposal to European Commission digital regulators to change their search engine’s anti-spam policy to downrank news publisher websites that engage in a practice dubbed “parasite SEO”. The move comes in response to the Commission’s Digital Markets Act (DMA) investigation of Google’s “site reputation abuse policy” that penalizes publisher websites when the established site sells pages to third parties and allow them to publish their own content on a branch of the publisher’s main site so that the third-party page does better in Google’s search algorithm by riding on the host site’s established search ranking. Google has defended the policy as an effort to improve user experiences by deterring a deceptive commercial practice. Last November, DMA regulators said that the anti-spam policy impacts a “common and legitimate way for publishers to monetize their websites”. Although the specific changes offered by Google have not been made public, the company said it is “continuing to engage constructively” with the European Commission and that they are trying to protect their users from “deceptive practices like ‘parasite SEO’ spam that undermine the web.”

Context – The “fairness” of Google search results has been an unending morass for decades. Every algorithm change benefits some websites while others feel aggrieved. The Digital Markets Act now regulates the largest digital platforms, including Google search. It’s complicated with competing interests besides Google. For example, DMA regulators have spent over two years pressing Google to change search to mollify specialized “vertical search” aggregators for services like flights and hotels without overly angering hotel chains and airlines who want high rankings too. Google argues that search is a complex black box intended to benefit users and that too much transparency breeds abuse. What this anti-spam dispute really illustrates is that the EU regulators are comfortable getting into the mix on highly technical disputes about user experience and how search operates. And “parasite SEO” is nothing compared to publisher concerns over AI in search.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
AI Hallucination Stories Grab Bag

Context - Within weeks of Chat-GPT’s public release, the fact that chatbots make plausible and realistic sounding stuff up emerged. The AI scientists knew about the phenomenon, which they called “hallucinations”. It appears to be baked into the technology. LLMs don’t...

Meta Challenges UK Online Safety Act Fees and Fines Regime

Report from The Guardian In Brief – Meta is challenging the methodology Ofcom, the UK’s communications regulator, uses to determine the regulatory fee and fines structure under the UK’s Online Safety Act (OSA). The fees that Ofcom charges regulated firms to fund the...

New York AG Opposes Surveillance Pricing and Electronic Shelf Labels

Report from WRVO In Brief – New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) is calling for state legislation to ban the use of personal data to influence prices, as well as a measure to prohibit grocery stores and pharmacies in the state from adopting digital shelf price...

Colorado Scales Back Its Big AI Safety Law

Report from Colorado Newsline In Brief – Colorado, which was the first state to enact comprehensive “AI Safety” legislation when it did so in 2024, was set to see it finally go into in go into effect in June, but instead the law has been frozen by a court...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required