bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Google Offers to Change Anti-Spam Policies to Appease EU Regulators

May 23, 2026

Report from Bloomberg
In Brief – Google has reportedly made a proposal to European Commission digital regulators to change their search engine’s anti-spam policy to downrank news publisher websites that engage in a practice dubbed “parasite SEO”. The move comes in response to the Commission’s Digital Markets Act (DMA) investigation of Google’s “site reputation abuse policy” that penalizes publisher websites when the established site sells pages to third parties and allow them to publish their own content on a branch of the publisher’s main site so that the third-party page does better in Google’s search algorithm by riding on the host site’s established search ranking. Google has defended the policy as an effort to improve user experiences by deterring a deceptive commercial practice. Last November, DMA regulators said that the anti-spam policy impacts a “common and legitimate way for publishers to monetize their websites”. Although the specific changes offered by Google have not been made public, the company said it is “continuing to engage constructively” with the European Commission and that they are trying to protect their users from “deceptive practices like ‘parasite SEO’ spam that undermine the web.”

Context – The “fairness” of Google search results has been an unending morass for decades. Every algorithm change benefits some websites while others feel aggrieved. The Digital Markets Act now regulates the largest digital platforms, including Google search. It’s complicated with competing interests besides Google. For example, DMA regulators have spent over two years pressing Google to change search to mollify specialized “vertical search” aggregators for services like flights and hotels without overly angering hotel chains and airlines who want high rankings too. Google argues that search is a complex black box intended to benefit users and that too much transparency breeds abuse. What this anti-spam dispute really illustrates is that the EU regulators are comfortable getting into the mix on highly technical disputes about user experience and how search operates. And “parasite SEO” is nothing compared to publisher concerns over AI in search.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
Swedish Court Orders Google to Pay Klarna Nearly $2 Billion in Damages

Report from EuroNews In Brief – Sweden’s Patent and Market Court has ruled in the antitrust damages case between comparison shopping site PriceRunner, which is owned by Sweden-based fintech company Klarna, and Google, ordering the US giant to pay 14.3 billion Swedish...

Trump Administration Lifts Export Ban on Top Anthropic Models

Report from the New York Times In Brief – The Trump administration lifted export restrictions that it had imposed on June 12th prohibiting Anthropic from allowing any foreign nationals from accessing it’s top AI models, allowing the company to restore access to Claude...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required