bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Google Offers to Change Anti-Spam Policies to Appease EU Regulators

May 23, 2026

Report from Bloomberg
In Brief – Google has reportedly made a proposal to European Commission digital regulators to change their search engine’s anti-spam policy to downrank news publisher websites that engage in a practice dubbed “parasite SEO”. The move comes in response to the Commission’s Digital Markets Act (DMA) investigation of Google’s “site reputation abuse policy” that penalizes publisher websites when the established site sells pages to third parties and allow them to publish their own content on a branch of the publisher’s main site so that the third-party page does better in Google’s search algorithm by riding on the host site’s established search ranking. Google has defended the policy as an effort to improve user experiences by deterring a deceptive commercial practice. Last November, DMA regulators said that the anti-spam policy impacts a “common and legitimate way for publishers to monetize their websites”. Although the specific changes offered by Google have not been made public, the company said it is “continuing to engage constructively” with the European Commission and that they are trying to protect their users from “deceptive practices like ‘parasite SEO’ spam that undermine the web.”

Context – The “fairness” of Google search results has been an unending morass for decades. Every algorithm change benefits some websites while others feel aggrieved. The Digital Markets Act now regulates the largest digital platforms, including Google search. It’s complicated with competing interests besides Google. For example, DMA regulators have spent over two years pressing Google to change search to mollify specialized “vertical search” aggregators for services like flights and hotels without overly angering hotel chains and airlines who want high rankings too. Google argues that search is a complex black box intended to benefit users and that too much transparency breeds abuse. What this anti-spam dispute really illustrates is that the EU regulators are comfortable getting into the mix on highly technical disputes about user experience and how search operates. And “parasite SEO” is nothing compared to publisher concerns over AI in search.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
European Commission Issues AI Content Notification Rules

Report from MediaPost In Brief – The AI transparency rules required by Article 50 of the EU’s AI Act have taken effect, requiring companies to clearly disclose when users are interacting with artificial intelligence or viewing AI-generated or manipulated images, audio...

More Follow-On Lawsuits for Google Likely After Latest DMA Fine

Report from Reuters In Brief – European lawyers and litigation financiers say that the European Commission’s recent decision to fine Google $1 billion for violating the Digital Markets Act (DMA) may add to the wave of private antitrust lawsuits that the search giant...

More Really Smart Tech People Call for International AI Governance

Report from the Washington Post In Brief – OpenAI and Anthropic have endorsed a petition urging the US government to help create an international regime to slow down and regulate the pace of “automated AI development.” It is signed by over 1,200 “employees of frontier...

Judge Dismisses Google’s DMCA Search Scraping Lawsuit

Report from MediaPost In Brief – Federal District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers has dismissed Google's complaint against the Texas-based company SerpApi for allegedly violating the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) anti-circumvention provisions by evading...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required