bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Google Offers to Change Anti-Spam Policies to Appease EU Regulators

May 23, 2026

Report from Bloomberg
In Brief – Google has reportedly made a proposal to European Commission digital regulators to change their search engine’s anti-spam policy to downrank news publisher websites that engage in a practice dubbed “parasite SEO”. The move comes in response to the Commission’s Digital Markets Act (DMA) investigation of Google’s “site reputation abuse policy” that penalizes publisher websites when the established site sells pages to third parties and allow them to publish their own content on a branch of the publisher’s main site so that the third-party page does better in Google’s search algorithm by riding on the host site’s established search ranking. Google has defended the policy as an effort to improve user experiences by deterring a deceptive commercial practice. Last November, DMA regulators said that the anti-spam policy impacts a “common and legitimate way for publishers to monetize their websites”. Although the specific changes offered by Google have not been made public, the company said it is “continuing to engage constructively” with the European Commission and that they are trying to protect their users from “deceptive practices like ‘parasite SEO’ spam that undermine the web.”

Context – The “fairness” of Google search results has been an unending morass for decades. Every algorithm change benefits some websites while others feel aggrieved. The Digital Markets Act now regulates the largest digital platforms, including Google search. It’s complicated with competing interests besides Google. For example, DMA regulators have spent over two years pressing Google to change search to mollify specialized “vertical search” aggregators for services like flights and hotels without overly angering hotel chains and airlines who want high rankings too. Google argues that search is a complex black box intended to benefit users and that too much transparency breeds abuse. What this anti-spam dispute really illustrates is that the EU regulators are comfortable getting into the mix on highly technical disputes about user experience and how search operates. And “parasite SEO” is nothing compared to publisher concerns over AI in search.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
German Court Rules That Google Is Responsible for AI Overview Errors

Report from The Decoder In Brief – The German Regional Court of Munich has ruled that Google is directly liable for false statements produced by its AI Overviews feature. The case involves two plaintiffs who alleged that Google’s AI summaries wrongly linked their...

Florida Sues OpenAI for Creating Chatbot That Endangers Children

Report from the Washington Post In Brief – The State of Florida has filed a civil lawsuit against OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman, alleging that ChatGPT was developed and marketed in ways that endanger children while prioritizing profit. The lawsuit...

European Commission Releases Long-Awaited Tech Sovereignty Plan

Report from the New York Times In Brief – The European Commission announced its technology sovereignty strategy to reduce dependence on foreign providers and strengthen Europe’s economic and geopolitical resilience. The initiative focuses on technology products and...

The European Commission Issues Temu a Digital Services Act Fine

Report from the New York Times In Brief – The European Union has fined the Chinese e-commerce platform Temu €200 million ($232 million) for violating the Digital Services Act (DSA) by failing to adequately identify and prevent the sale of illegal products on its...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required