bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

White House Trying to Pair AI State Preemption with Social Media Limits

Jun 13, 2026

Report from Politico
In Brief – The White House is reportedly engaged in negotiations with Big Tech critics to craft a bill that combines three years of federal preemption of some state AI laws with social media and AI regulatory proposals that have been tied up in Congress for years. The effort includes talks with Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), a Big Tech antagonist, and child safety advocates to gauge their willingness to support a package that includes Blackburn’s Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) that regulates how digital platforms serve teens and the App Store Accountability Act requiring app stores to verify user ages and app developers to restrict services by age. Sen. Blackburn, a backer of the NO FAKES Act that creates a federal right of publicity allowing individuals to protect their voice and visual likeness from digital replicas, is pressing to include it as well. The child safety groups are asking for additional measures, such as the GUARD Act or other regulation of AI chatbots. The preemption of state laws would not cover all AI regulations but only state regulations addressing the same issues as the new federal law.

Context – Tech backing of President Trump dramatically increased in response to the antagonism of the Biden years. AI development and deregulation has been a top priority of the second Trump Administration who pitch it as critical to competing with China. Ironically, while even the EU has begun to dial back AI regulation, some US states are moving in the other direction. The White House has pushed a moratorium on state AI laws but it has been blocked by united Democratic opposition backed by enough Republican tech critics, including Blackburn. Proposals like KOSA and online age verification have been stymied for by free speechprivacy, and civil liberties advocates, as well as conservative critics of EU-style tech regulation. Similar opposition on the left and right, as well as likely Democratic interest in keeping AI regulation on the political front burner, will test any new deal. An earlier Blackburn AI proposal included sunsetting Sec. 230, so backers of this offer are probably saying to non-AI tech companies, “It could be worse”.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
Yelp Wins Legal Ruling in Antitrust Battle with Google

Report from Courthouse News Service In Brief – Federal Magistrate Judge Susan Van Keulen has ruled that Yelp, a leading internet company critic of Google’s search practices, can rely on District Judge Amit Mehta’s 2024 decision in the Justice Department’s landmark...

Illinois Governor Signs Robust AI “Safety” Law

Report from CBS News In Brief – Illinois Governor JB Pritzker (D) has signed the AI Safety Measures Act into law pushing the state to the forefront of AI regulation. The law imposes “safety” requirements on companies developing so-called frontier AI models, including...

Japan Moving to Regulate Social Media and AI in Election Campaigns

Report from Nippon.com In Brief – Japan's House of Representatives, the lower chamber of the Diet, has approved two bills by a majority vote that are intended to address the misuse of social media during election campaigns. The bills, which must next be considered by...

UK CMA Joins the Apple and Google App Store Global Regulation Parade

Report from Reuters In Brief – Britain’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has announced its proposed new regulations to require Apple’s and Google’s app stores to allow app developers to direct users to third-party payment options to increase competition and...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required