bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Meta Challenges UK Online Safety Act Fees and Fines Regime

May 23, 2026

Report from The Guardian
In Brief – Meta is challenging the methodology Ofcom, the UK’s communications regulator, uses to determine the regulatory fee and fines structure under the UK’s Online Safety Act (OSA). The fees that Ofcom charges regulated firms to fund the OSA’s regulatory process, as well as fines that could be imposed on a regulated company, are based on a company’s “Qualified Worldwide Revenues”. The fees are a percentage of QWR but apply only to businesses that made more than £250m globally the previous year. Meta is seeking judicial review in the UK High Court, contending that the approach is disproportionate and places an excessive share of Ofcom’s regulatory costs on large multinational technology firms with significant revenue outside the country. Meta argues that Ofcom fees and fines should be based on operations and revenues in the UK. Ofcom said its interpretation reflects a straightforward reading of the legislation and vowed to defend the regime.

Context – When the EU created their twin regulatory regimes for digital platforms in 2022, they established a way to pay for the Digital Services Act (DSA) but not the Digital Markets Act (DMA). The DSA fee is modeled on the supervisory fee regimes that fund bank regulators. The DSA fee regime applies only to very large digital platforms that are regulated directly by the European Commission, not to smaller platforms overseen by member state regulators. The DSA fee is based on global users and profits. Meta and Google have filed lawsuits challenging the funding EU mechanism. The two platforms, who reportedly pay a majority of the total DSA fees, argue that basing the contribution on profits imposes disproportionate burdens on a handful of platforms while allowing others, such as Amazon, Snap and X, to impose significant burdens on the regulator without paying into the enforcement kitty because they did not report net profits. The German Government has proposed creating a permanent DMA supervisory fee modeled after the DSA version, but the EU Commission has not backed the idea.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
German Court Rules That Google Is Responsible for AI Overview Errors

Report from The Decoder In Brief – The German Regional Court of Munich has ruled that Google is directly liable for false statements produced by its AI Overviews feature. The case involves two plaintiffs who alleged that Google’s AI summaries wrongly linked their...

Florida Sues OpenAI for Creating Chatbot That Endangers Children

Report from the Washington Post In Brief – The State of Florida has filed a civil lawsuit against OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman, alleging that ChatGPT was developed and marketed in ways that endanger children while prioritizing profit. The lawsuit...

European Commission Releases Long-Awaited Tech Sovereignty Plan

Report from the New York Times In Brief – The European Commission announced its technology sovereignty strategy to reduce dependence on foreign providers and strengthen Europe’s economic and geopolitical resilience. The initiative focuses on technology products and...

The European Commission Issues Temu a Digital Services Act Fine

Report from the New York Times In Brief – The European Union has fined the Chinese e-commerce platform Temu €200 million ($232 million) for violating the Digital Services Act (DSA) by failing to adequately identify and prevent the sale of illegal products on its...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required