bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

India Adds Deepfakes to Tightened Social Media Takedown Regime

Feb 21, 2026

Report from MediaNews4U

In Brief – India has amended its rules requiring social media platforms such as Meta, YouTube and X to remove unlawful material, adding AI-generated “deepfakes” to the regime. The new rules, which go into effect on February 20, bring AI-generated content under the 2021 Indian IT Act that applies to unlawful online information, and shortens the current 36-hour deadline for platforms to take down material to just three hours after receiving notice from government authorities. To address government concerns with “deepfakes”, the new regulations require social media platforms to obtain a user declaration before publishing content stating whether audio, visual, or audio-visual content that appears real is synthetically generated, and then requires the platforms to use “reasonable and appropriate technical measures,” including automated tools, to verify those user declarations. If content is confirmed to be synthetic, it must be clearly and prominently labeled. Companies must also embed permanent metadata or provenance markers, including unique identifiers where technically feasible, to trace the resource used to create or modify the material. India’s current IT law permits government authorities to issue broad content takedown orders, with tens of thousands issued in recent years. Critics say that shortening the time given to platforms to comply to just three hours will push them to adopt automated take-down processes rather than reviewing individual takedown orders.

Context – Social media companies have long dealt with governments, including democracies, who have seen content online that they don’t like and pushed platforms to police it. Social media regulation in Russia, Turkey, and India is easily criticized on censorship grounds, but Germany, France, and Australia were early adopters as well, and the EU’s Digital Services Act and UK Online Safety Bill have been criticized as justifying the mechanisms of online censorship. In practice, platform compliance appears closely linked to the perceived long-term economic value of the market in question.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
Federal Trade Commission Proposes Policy on Personalized Pricing

Report from the Washington Post In Brief – The Federal Trade Commission has proposed exposing companies to federal charges if they secretly use personal data to vary prices based on what individual consumers are believed to be willing to pay. FTC Chairman Andrew...

Apple Will Change App Data Use Prompts to Settle German Probe

Report from Euractiv In Brief – Apple has settled an antitrust investigation by Germany’s competition authority by agreeing to redesign privacy prompts that third-party app developers show mobile users when seeking consent to use their data for targeted advertising....

Court Overturns Ban on Perplexity Shopping Agent Accessing Amazon

Report from MediaPost In Brief – A federal district court injunction barring Perplexity's AI shopping agent, Comet, from accessing Amazon has been overturned by an appeals panel of the US Ninth District that found it was unlikely that the AI company would be found to...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required