bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

US Department of Justice Won’t Help French Prosecutors Probe Musk’s X

May 2, 2026

Report from the Wall Street Journal
In Brief – The US Justice Department is declining to assist French authorities investigating X, describing the effort as a politically motivated misuse of the criminal justice system to regulate online speech in a way that conflicts with US First Amendment protections. Pushing back on alleged online censorship in Europe is a top priority of the Trump Administration. Officials of the Paris prosecutor’s office defended the independence of the French judiciary and said that they would continue their investigation regardless. The probe began in January 2025 after accusations that X’s algorithm promoted Musk’s political views. It has been expanded to include concerns over objectionable content including Holocaust denial, child sexual abuse material, and nonconsensual deepfakes. Authorities have sought access to X’s algorithm and summoned Elon Musk and company executives for interviews, although they could compel them with arrest warrants.

Context – The criminal investigation of X by Paris prosecutors began amid intense criticism of Musk by European leaders angered by his engagement on populist political battles in numerous countries. French President Emmanuelle Macron called for him to face personal sanctions for “election interference” and a legislator backing Macron called for the Paris prosecutors to get involved. They did. The Digital Services Act (DSA) is the EU law that regulates how platforms like X address illegal and objectionable content, and the European Commission is X’s lead regulator. Commission regulators are currently engaged in several investigations of X, including how its algorithms handle politically sensitive content and issues related to images created by Grok AI. The DSA’s backers say that the law protects free expression, but they also argue that law’s regulation of “recommender systems” is different from regulating content itself. Of course, critics disagree. Along with directly poking the Trump Administration, the Paris prosecutor’s office increasingly appears to be a French Government tool to press Brussels on aggressive digital regulation of platform like X, Telegram, and Shein.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
German Court Rules That Google Is Responsible for AI Overview Errors

Report from The Decoder In Brief – The German Regional Court of Munich has ruled that Google is directly liable for false statements produced by its AI Overviews feature. The case involves two plaintiffs who alleged that Google’s AI summaries wrongly linked their...

Florida Sues OpenAI for Creating Chatbot That Endangers Children

Report from the Washington Post In Brief – The State of Florida has filed a civil lawsuit against OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman, alleging that ChatGPT was developed and marketed in ways that endanger children while prioritizing profit. The lawsuit...

European Commission Releases Long-Awaited Tech Sovereignty Plan

Report from the New York Times In Brief – The European Commission announced its technology sovereignty strategy to reduce dependence on foreign providers and strengthen Europe’s economic and geopolitical resilience. The initiative focuses on technology products and...

The European Commission Issues Temu a Digital Services Act Fine

Report from the New York Times In Brief – The European Union has fined the Chinese e-commerce platform Temu €200 million ($232 million) for violating the Digital Services Act (DSA) by failing to adequately identify and prevent the sale of illegal products on its...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required