bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Trump Administration Walks Back Revenge Tax After Minimum Tax Deal

Jul 1, 2025

Report from the New York Times

In Brief – The Trump Administration has called on Republicans in Congress to drop a controversial tax provision dubbed the “Revenge Tax” from the massive budget reconciliation bill. Referred to as Sec. 899, the measure would impose a new federal tax penalty on foreign investors from countries that impose “unfair” taxes on US companies. The tax penalty was primarily linked to two foreign tax policies, digital services taxes (DTSs) imposed primarily on US-based tech giants, and taxes enforcing the global “minimum tax” component of the two-part global tax reform agreement negotiated by the Biden Administration at the OECD in 2021. Critics of Sec. 899 argued that the tax penalty, which could reach up to 15% on earnings from a wide range of investments in the US, would lead to less foreign investment in US-based assets, including directly in US companies and equities, as well as in the US-based operations of foreign corporations. Secretary of Treasury Scott Bessent announced that he had reached agreement with other Group of 7 Finance Ministers to exempt US corporations from the other countries’ global minimum taxes and would be working to get the same commitment from the rest of the Group of 20 countries, and so the Congress should pull the Revenge Tax out of the budget bill. Sec. Bessent did not directly address foreign DSTs.

Context – President Trump aggressively opposed DSTs in his first term and used tariff threats to keep them at bay. He also criticized the OECD tax agreement, as did most congressional Republicans. Trump quickly exited the OECD deal when he returned to office in January and revived tariff threats against countries with DSTs. But following April’s massive wave of tariffs imposed on countries regardless of DST policies, the effectiveness of tariff threats to claw back DSTs appeared questionable. Sec. 899 was a big new stick showing the commitment of the Trump Administration to deliver a win for Big Tech. But it seems to have been too big a swing and combatting digital taxes will instead be sent back to the various trade negotiation queues.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
AI Hallucination Stories Grab Bag

Context - Within weeks of Chat-GPT’s public release, the fact that chatbots make plausible and realistic sounding stuff up emerged. The AI scientists knew about the phenomenon, which they called “hallucinations”. It appears to be baked into the technology. LLMs don’t...

Meta Challenges UK Online Safety Act Fees and Fines Regime

Report from The Guardian In Brief – Meta is challenging the methodology Ofcom, the UK’s communications regulator, uses to determine the regulatory fee and fines structure under the UK’s Online Safety Act (OSA). The fees that Ofcom charges regulated firms to fund the...

New York AG Opposes Surveillance Pricing and Electronic Shelf Labels

Report from WRVO In Brief – New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) is calling for state legislation to ban the use of personal data to influence prices, as well as a measure to prohibit grocery stores and pharmacies in the state from adopting digital shelf price...

Google Offers to Change Anti-Spam Policies to Appease EU Regulators

Report from Bloomberg In Brief – Google has reportedly made a proposal to European Commission digital regulators to change their search engine's anti-spam policy to downrank news publisher websites that engage in a practice dubbed “parasite SEO”. The move comes in...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required