bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

X Commits to Strengthen Anti-Terror Content Moderation in the UK

May 30, 2026

Report from The Guardian
In Brief – Ofcom, the UK regulator enforcing the Online Safety Act (OSA), has announced that X has agreed to strengthen its moderation of terrorist and hate-related content. The commitments stem from Ofcom’s discussions with the top social media platform to meet their OSA responsibilities as concerns over online extremism have intensified amid rising antisemitic incidents in the country. The platform has agreed to block access for British users to accounts linked to organizations banned under UK terrorism laws, review at least 85% of flagged illegal terrorist and hate content within 48 hours, and consult with outside experts when assessing reports of extremist material. Critics of X’s content moderation practice cautiously responded to the new commitments, with some arguing X still fails to adequately address racism and hate speech. Ofcom noted that the agreement does not end Ofcom’s scrutiny of xAI’s Grok’s image tool generating non-consensual intimate imagery.

Context – One of the unwritten rules of global digital regulation is that giant platforms will eventually conform to national rules in countries with big, important domestic markets. The UK’s Online Safety Act fits that bill, as does the EU’s Digital Services Act and recent entries from Brazil and Indonesia. Yes, X’s owner Elon Musk has often been outspoken criticizing “woke” content moderation demands, but he has also long said that X’s policy is to adhere to “national laws” in enforcing content moderation. Faced with Grok-generated regulatory scrutiny over sexually-suggestive AI-images earlier this year, he turned to this national law framework, saying that Grok would be limited to creating legal content in each market. Of all the digital policy issues animating the Trump Administration, fighting against what they believe is anti-populist online censorship is the only one with backing across the spectrum of US conservatives. Pushing back on anti-Semitic violence in the UK is not generally seen as anti-populist. However, the EU’s DSA investigation of X’s algorithms and content moderation remain a major potential international digital policy tripwire.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
German Court Rules That Google Is Responsible for AI Overview Errors

Report from The Decoder In Brief – The German Regional Court of Munich has ruled that Google is directly liable for false statements produced by its AI Overviews feature. The case involves two plaintiffs who alleged that Google’s AI summaries wrongly linked their...

Florida Sues OpenAI for Creating Chatbot That Endangers Children

Report from the Washington Post In Brief – The State of Florida has filed a civil lawsuit against OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman, alleging that ChatGPT was developed and marketed in ways that endanger children while prioritizing profit. The lawsuit...

European Commission Releases Long-Awaited Tech Sovereignty Plan

Report from the New York Times In Brief – The European Commission announced its technology sovereignty strategy to reduce dependence on foreign providers and strengthen Europe’s economic and geopolitical resilience. The initiative focuses on technology products and...

The European Commission Issues Temu a Digital Services Act Fine

Report from the New York Times In Brief – The European Union has fined the Chinese e-commerce platform Temu €200 million ($232 million) for violating the Digital Services Act (DSA) by failing to adequately identify and prevent the sale of illegal products on its...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required