bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Wikimedia Foundation Challenges Online Safety Act Designation in UK Court

Jul 1, 2025

Report from UKTN

In Brief – The Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit behind the Wikipedia knowledge platform, has gone to the High Court of Justice in London to challenge how the platform is categorized under the Online Safety Act (OSA). The non-profit says that designating Wikipedia as a Category 1 platform, meaning a high-risk website, would apply duties that would undermine the quality and integrity of the content on its services. Of most concern is the requirement to verify the identity of its users, particularly the 260,000 volunteer editors from around the world, many of whom choose to stay anonymous, in some cases for their own protection. Placing Wikipedia in Category 1 would “undermine the privacy and safety of Wikipedia’s volunteer contributors, expose the encyclopedia to manipulation and vandalism, and divert essential resources from protecting people and improving Wikipedia”. They are joined in the case by a longtime UK-based volunteer contributor referred to as User:Zzuuzz, whose true identity will remain confidential. Wikimedia’s General Counsel said, “We trust the court will protect Wikipedia, a vital encyclopedic resource, from rules crafted for the internet’s riskiest commercial sites and, in doing so, safeguard the open internet for everyone.”

Context – The OSA empowered Ofcom, the UK communications regulator, to “make online services safer” by making “sure companies have effective systems in place to protect users” from illegal and harmful content including child sexual exploitation and abuse, hate, harassment, and encouraging self-harm. Requiring digital services to put guardrails in place to protect minors has been a top priority, with adult websites and social media platforms announcing new technical age verification policies for UK users. Ofcom has described the OSA as a “regulatory cousin” rather than “identical twin” of the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA). Wikipedia is a Very Large Online Platform under the DSA, facing the most stringent obligations, resulting in a compliance process that the foundation calls a “major challenge”. Australia will soon be age-checking online search.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
European Commission Issues AI Content Notification Rules

Report from MediaPost In Brief – The AI transparency rules required by Article 50 of the EU’s AI Act have taken effect, requiring companies to clearly disclose when users are interacting with artificial intelligence or viewing AI-generated or manipulated images, audio...

More Follow-On Lawsuits for Google Likely After Latest DMA Fine

Report from Reuters In Brief – European lawyers and litigation financiers say that the European Commission’s recent decision to fine Google $1 billion for violating the Digital Markets Act (DMA) may add to the wave of private antitrust lawsuits that the search giant...

More Really Smart Tech People Call for International AI Governance

Report from the Washington Post In Brief – OpenAI and Anthropic have endorsed a petition urging the US government to help create an international regime to slow down and regulate the pace of “automated AI development.” It is signed by over 1,200 “employees of frontier...

Judge Dismisses Google’s DMCA Search Scraping Lawsuit

Report from MediaPost In Brief – Federal District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers has dismissed Google's complaint against the Texas-based company SerpApi for allegedly violating the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) anti-circumvention provisions by evading...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required