bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

White House Kills Some Utah AI Bills but Several Reach Governor Cox

Mar 21, 2026

Report from the Transparency Coalition

In Brief – Efforts by officials in Republican-dominated Utah to position the state as a leader in regulating AI faced resistance from the Trump White House, which labeled one AI safety proposal “unfixable” and warned that some measures risked stifling innovation. Top targets were HB 286, which required AI developers to publish safety plans and report incidents affecting Utah children, and B 438, which would regulate companion chatbots designed to simulate ongoing relationships. Both measures eventually stalled in the state Senate. Lawmakers did send several other AI-related bills to Governor Spencer Cox (R). HB 276 creates protections against deepfake intimate images, mandates provenance data for AI-generated content, and establishes civil liability along with notice-and-takedown requirements. SB 256 clarifies that defamation law applies to AI-generated content. HB 289 updates child sexual abuse material statutes to include AI-generated imagery. SB 319 requires human oversight in health insurance preauthorization decisions, while SB 150 limits AI-only treatment in medical practice.

Context – After failing to enact a five-year long federal moratorium on state AI regulation last year, President Trump issued an executive order that calls on federal agencies to “check the most onerous and excessive” state laws in favor of a “minimally burdensome, uniform national policy framework.” The White House sided with industry backers against a handful of Republican Governors who argue that states should be able to regulate the technology to protect their citizens, along with populist conservative activists, including some in Congress, who joined with Democrats who appear united against any federal restriction on AI regulation by states. The second Trump Administration, with a far bigger cohort of tech backers than the first, has pushed US AI policy firmly in the direction of deregulation and investment and pitched AI development as a national imperative to compete with China on economic, strategic and national security grounds. AI regulation in big Red States including Florida and Ohio are at the frontline in the intra-party fight.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
Apple Still Trying to Reverse Epic Antitrust Loss at Supreme Court

Report from Reuters In Brief – Apple has asked the US Supreme Court to review a lower court ruling that found the company in civil contempt for violating an injunction tied to its long-running legal fight with Epic Games. The Apple v Epic antitrust dispute began in...

Trump Cancels Executive Order on “Voluntary” AI Security Reviews

Report from the Washington Post In Brief – President Donald Trump cancelled signing a major executive order on artificial intelligence after last-minute lobbying from leading tech industry figures, including Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and former White House AI...

X Commits to Strengthen Anti-Terror Content Moderation in the UK

Report from The Guardian In Brief – Ofcom, the UK regulator enforcing the Online Safety Act (OSA), has announced that X has agreed to strengthen its moderation of terrorist and hate-related content. The commitments stem from Ofcom’s discussions with the top social...

Meta Joins Snap, TikTok and YouTube to Settle School District Lawsuit

Report from the New York Times In Brief – Meta has reached reached a settlement agreement in the first lawsuit headed to trial in federal court over claims that addiction to social media platforms has pushed public schools to spend massive sums fighting a youth mental...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required