bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Virginia AG Says State Will Enforce Social Media Teen Time Limit Law

Feb 28, 2026

Report from Axios
In Brief – Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones announced that he will “fully enforce” the state’s new law limiting minors under 16 to one hour per day on any single social media platform, even as a legal challenge brought by tech industry trade group NetChoice moves forward. The restrictions, which require companies to use commercially reasonable age-verification methods and allow parents to adjust the default one-hour cap with consent, took effect January 1. NetChoice, which filed suit in November to block the law, argues that it violates the First Amendment by limiting minors’ time spent engaging in protected speech and effectively requiring adults to verify their age, and is seeking a preliminary injunction from US District Judge Patricia Tolliver. Both sides raise historical legal analogies, with NetChoice describing the law as “the latest attempt in a long line of government efforts to restrict new forms of constitutionally protected expression based on concerns about their potential effects on minors,” comparing social media to television, rock music, and video games, while the state argues that a social media time limit is no different than setting a curfew for public parks or for attending movies.

Context – States keep passing laws regulating how social media sites serve teens. While Virginia is the first to enact a daily time limit, most prohibit so-called “addictive” features such as auto-scrolling and “likes”. Many have been blocked by federal judges for violating the First Amendment. In 2024, the Supreme Court’s Moody v. NetChoice decision saw five justices calling social media a clearly expressive activity strongly protected by First Amendment. But last year the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals allowed Mississippi’s social media regulation to stand as litigation proceeded and the High Court refused to overturn that order, creating new uncertainty. Another class of state social media law requires warning labels telling users at regular intervals that social media is harmful to mental health. New York recently joined Minnesota, California and Colorado mandating warning messages, with Colorado’s already put on hold for unconstitutionally compelling speech.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
US Supreme Court Soundly Rejects Broad ISP Liability for User Piracy

Report from the New York Times In Brief – The Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that Cox Communications cannot be held liable for copyright infringement committed by its users, even if the company knows some customers engage in piracy and yet it does not cut them...

Tech Trade Group Challenges Chicago’s Social Media Tax

Report from the Chicago Sun-Times In Brief – NetChoice, a digital company trade group, is suing to block the City of Chicago’s new social media tax, arguing it violates the First Amendment and the federal Permanent Internet Tax Freedom Act (PITFA). The new tax extends...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required