bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Judge Allowing California AG Lawsuit Targeting TikTok’s Addictive Design

Feb 28, 2026

Report from Bloomberg
In Brief – A California judge has tentatively ruled that TikTok must face the state’s lawsuit alleging the platform’s design is addictive and harmful to children. Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Beth McGowen rejected the company’s attempt to dismiss the case under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which shields online platforms from liability for user-generated content. She said that California’s suit targets TikTok’s design, not its role as a publisher, and therefore is not barred by the federal law. Judge McGowen scheduled a hearing to allow TikTok to challenge the tentative ruling before it becomes final. California and more than a dozen other states sued TikTok in 2024. The complaint alleges the company violated state consumer protection laws by misleading users about child safety tools and incorporating addictive features such as auto-play, infinite scrolling and livestreams. The suit also argues that TikTok’s beauty filters harm children’s self-esteem.

Context – Social media critics have been pursuing civil litigation alleging that the platforms were intentionally developed to addict users, especially teens. The lawsuits focus on platform design features, product liability theories and consumer protection laws to circumvent Sec. 230. Along with the state AG suits, there are thousands of private plaintiffs, including individuals who claim to have suffered mental health injuries and school systems who claim they needed to spend millions dealing with addicted youths. Private lawsuits have largely been consolidated in the California state court of Judge Carolyn Kuhl or the federal district court of Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. In 2023, the two judges each ruled that Sec. 230 shielded the platforms from some but not all charges, allowing complaints related to platform features to proceed. In 2024, Judge Kuhl dismissed the school district lawsuits, ruling that their claims about student behavior were too remote to impose liability on the platforms. On the other hand, Gonzalez Rogers recently allowed a school district lawsuit to proceed. The first major trial in Kuhl’s court, involving an allegedly addicted young user, is underway.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
European Commission Issues AI Content Notification Rules

Report from MediaPost In Brief – The AI transparency rules required by Article 50 of the EU’s AI Act have taken effect, requiring companies to clearly disclose when users are interacting with artificial intelligence or viewing AI-generated or manipulated images, audio...

More Follow-On Lawsuits for Google Likely After Latest DMA Fine

Report from Reuters In Brief – European lawyers and litigation financiers say that the European Commission’s recent decision to fine Google $1 billion for violating the Digital Markets Act (DMA) may add to the wave of private antitrust lawsuits that the search giant...

More Really Smart Tech People Call for International AI Governance

Report from the Washington Post In Brief – OpenAI and Anthropic have endorsed a petition urging the US government to help create an international regime to slow down and regulate the pace of “automated AI development.” It is signed by over 1,200 “employees of frontier...

Judge Dismisses Google’s DMCA Search Scraping Lawsuit

Report from MediaPost In Brief – Federal District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers has dismissed Google's complaint against the Texas-based company SerpApi for allegedly violating the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) anti-circumvention provisions by evading...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required