bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Supreme Court Will Hear Challenge to Apple Contempt Order in Epic Fight

Jul 11, 2026

Report from Reuters
In Brief – The US Supreme Court has stepped into the long-running antitrust battle between Apple and Epic Games by choosing to accept Apple’s challenge to Federal Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Roger’s contempt order against the iPhone giant. The High Court’s review will focus on the legal question of whether courts should issue contempt findings based on the “spirit” of an injunction or strictly adhere to its explicit, literal text. The dispute began in 2020 when Epic challenged Apple’s 30% commission on in-app payments. While Epic’s federal antitrust claims failed, Gonzalez Rogers determined that Apple’s anti-steering provisions prohibiting app developers from directing users to alternatives violated California’s unfair competition law, and directed Apple to allow app developer links to alternative payment methods. Apple changed its rules to allow external links but implemented a new commission up to 27 percent. The judge later found Apple in contempt, ruling that the fee violated the “spirit” of her injunction and imposed severe penalties, including entirely prohibiting the Apple commissions. In December, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the contempt finding but ruled that Apple had the right to argue for the court to set a commission level above zero. That new effort before Gonzalez Rogers has not yet begun.

Context – Epic’s 2020 antitrust lawsuits against Apple and Google kicked off a global campaign to drive down app store fees. It’s been six years, but they are winning. Google, with a more open ecosystem, lost their US trial. They have negotiated a global settlement with Epic for lower fees and secure third-party app stores. Despite Apple appearing to largely prevail in its trial, Gonzalez Rogers, who made it clear all along that she thought Apple’s fees were too high, imposed an order on Apple that proved as restrictive as what Google faced after losing. While the Supreme Court declined to hear Apple’s initial appeal, they are stepping into the question of the 9th Circuit’s support for judges enforcing the “spirit” of court injunctions. In the meantime, governments in major global markets are moving to strictly regulate the app store giants.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
EU Commission Accepts X’s Plan to Address DSA Transparency Concerns

Report from MediaPost In Brief – The European Commission has announced the approval of X’s plan to address several Digital Services Act (DSA) compliance shortcomings identified by the regulator. The decision follows the €120 million fine imposed on the social media...

TikTok’s Latest EU DSA Charges Allege Failing to Protect Minors

Report from Reuters In Brief – TikTok faces fresh allegations from the European Commission that its platform design violates the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA) by failing to adequately protect minors. The preliminary findings mark the fourth DSA case opened against...

New Jersey Bans So-Called “Surveillance Pricing” for Groceries

Report from NJ.Com In Brief – New Jersey Gov. Mikie Sherrill (D) has signed the Fair Price Protection Act, banning grocery stores and third-party grocery delivery platforms from using consumers' personal data to set or vary food prices. Sherrill said the measure will...

France Officially Sets 15-Year-Old Age Threshold for Social Media

Report from the New York Times In Brief – France has become the first European country to fully approve a nationwide ban on social media for children under 15, with the law expected to take effect as early as Sept. 1. Passed by large majorities in both houses of the...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required