bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Robby Starbuck Settles with Meta on AI Defamation and Will Advise on Bias

Aug 1, 2025

Report from the Wall Street Journal

In Brief – Robby Starbuck, a conservative activist who has pressured companies to change their DEI practices, has settled a defamation lawsuit he brought against Meta that alleged the company’s AI tool smeared him by falsely asserting he participated in the January 6 riot and that he was linked to QAnon. Starbuck will serve as an advisor to Meta on how it can mitigate ideological and political bias in its AI tools. In April, in a lengthy blog post that preceded the Starbuck matter, Meta detailed the development, training and operations of its openly available Llama AI models, and said that leading LLMs “historically have leaned left when it comes to debated political and social topics” based on the how they have been trained, and that the company’s goal was “to remove bias from our AI models”.

Context – On the issue of AI hallucinations as defamation, the first major lawsuit, a Georgia state court case involving ChatGPT, was recently dismissed, with the judge noting in her order that OpenAI worked hard to reduce errors and extensively warns users that its system could make them. That said, ideological bias and “hallucinations” are different things. The initial Starbuck complaint about untrue statements seemed like a hallucination suit. However, bias, especially as defined by Meta, is about intentional answers due to training data sets being skewed in ways that some people could consider ideological, reinforcement learning methods that some could see as ideological, and “guardrails” that all companies use to limit or direct AI models that can seem biased. No digital issue unites conservatives more than the view that content moderation on the big digital platforms has been slanted against conservative viewpoints because the main companies operate in what is perceived as a progressive monoculture in the Bay Area. Similar ideological bias within AI chatbots, especially ChatGPT, quickly became a point of contention and the Trump AI Action Plan includes an executive order against “Woke AI”. Of course, everything about bias is subjective without agreement between left and right. Different platform options seems the best antidote.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
European Commission Issues AI Content Notification Rules

Report from MediaPost In Brief – The AI transparency rules required by Article 50 of the EU’s AI Act have taken effect, requiring companies to clearly disclose when users are interacting with artificial intelligence or viewing AI-generated or manipulated images, audio...

More Follow-On Lawsuits for Google Likely After Latest DMA Fine

Report from Reuters In Brief – European lawyers and litigation financiers say that the European Commission’s recent decision to fine Google $1 billion for violating the Digital Markets Act (DMA) may add to the wave of private antitrust lawsuits that the search giant...

More Really Smart Tech People Call for International AI Governance

Report from the Washington Post In Brief – OpenAI and Anthropic have endorsed a petition urging the US government to help create an international regime to slow down and regulate the pace of “automated AI development.” It is signed by over 1,200 “employees of frontier...

Judge Dismisses Google’s DMCA Search Scraping Lawsuit

Report from MediaPost In Brief – Federal District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers has dismissed Google's complaint against the Texas-based company SerpApi for allegedly violating the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) anti-circumvention provisions by evading...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required