bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

New York Legislature Passes Bill Banning Data-Informed Pricing

Jun 27, 2026

Report from Gothamist
In Brief – The New York state legislature has passed a bill to prohibit most businesses from using consumers’ personal data to set individualized prices, a long-standing practice in ecommerce that critics call “surveillance pricing.” Backers say the legislation will stop discriminatory pricing while still preserving so-called “loyalty” and “rewards” programs” and “just for you” coupons, provided that customers voluntarily enroll for them and discounts are based on someone’s purchase history rather than broader personal data. Business groups and grocery industry representatives oppose the legislation and warn that its ambiguous language could undermine those popular discount programs and force them to be scaled back. The surveillance-pricing bill now awaits action by Governor Kathy Hochul (D) who has until the end of the year to sign or reject the measure.

Context – Progressive tech industry critics have targeted “surveillance” and “algorithmic” pricing for years. Claims that AI will be used to supercharge the long-time ecommerce practice has led to a flood of state legislative proposals. One of the big dividing lines is between bills to prohibit the practice in physical stores and bills that also target online commerce. To be clear, there are no reports of any stores using surveillance, data and AI to apply in-store personalized pricing. It’s simply not a real thing and there are too many barriers to actually doing it to detail here. Nevertheless, attempts to ban in-store personalized pricing, and even electronic shelf price labels themselves, is being pursued by legislators looking for an AI issue. A bill banning electronic shelf labels was also moving in New York but failed to win an Assembly vote. To be clear, some manner of personalized prices has been a feature of online commerce for decades. People sometimes get lower offers, sometimes higher. Shockingly, people only like lower price offers. Earlier this year Maryland enacted a ban on personalized pricing in larger grocery stores but did not apply it broadly online. Connecticut, like the New York legislature, passed legislation broadly restricting pricing practices, online and offline. Colorado’s Governor recently vetoed a broad pricing bill.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
Yelp Wins Legal Ruling in Antitrust Battle with Google

Report from Courthouse News Service In Brief – Federal Magistrate Judge Susan Van Keulen has ruled that Yelp, a leading internet company critic of Google’s search practices, can rely on District Judge Amit Mehta’s 2024 decision in the Justice Department’s landmark...

Illinois Governor Signs Robust AI “Safety” Law

Report from CBS News In Brief – Illinois Governor JB Pritzker (D) has signed the AI Safety Measures Act into law pushing the state to the forefront of AI regulation. The law imposes “safety” requirements on companies developing so-called frontier AI models, including...

Japan Moving to Regulate Social Media and AI in Election Campaigns

Report from Nippon.com In Brief – Japan's House of Representatives, the lower chamber of the Diet, has approved two bills by a majority vote that are intended to address the misuse of social media during election campaigns. The bills, which must next be considered by...

UK CMA Joins the Apple and Google App Store Global Regulation Parade

Report from Reuters In Brief – Britain’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has announced its proposed new regulations to require Apple’s and Google’s app stores to allow app developers to direct users to third-party payment options to increase competition and...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required