bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

German Court Appears Likely to Reject Apple’s Challenge to Special Antitrust Standard

Feb 12, 2025

Report from Bloomberg

In Brief – Apple’s legal challenge to the German Federal Cartel Office (FCO) designation that they are a digital company “of paramount significance on competition across markets” appears to face skeptical judges on the Federal Court of Justice in Karlsruhe, the country’s top civil court. Apple is one of five digital giants, along with Google, Meta, Amazon, and Microsoft, that are covered by Section 19(a) of the German Competition Act that enables the country’s competition regulator to prohibit the largest digital companies from undermining competition in any market in which they operate. The law requires the FCO to first determine if a digital company meets the standard of having paramount significant across markets, and then the agency can establish rules to protect competition in the markets they occupy, such as prohibiting preferential treatment for their own services or hindering interoperability. The FCO ruled in April 2023 that Apple was so designated, but the iPhone giant challenged the determination arguing that the FCO did not present an accurate picture of the hardware market in Germany and the competition that Apple faced. In the hearing, Presiding Judge Wolfgang Kirchhoff cited a long list of reasons why Apple likely qualifies for tighter regulation under Section 19(a), including its financial power, its market shares, and the fact that it bundles its hardware and software products.

Context – The German law allowing the FCO to regulate digital giants was a harbinger of the EU’s Digital Markets Act. Some German officials have questioned the DMA for being too limited in the types of conduct they can address. While there are seven DMA “gatekeepers”, only 24 of their designated “core platform services” are covered by the law. Section 19(a) authority allows the FCO to regulate any service of a designated digital giant. For example, the FCO used its authority to regulate Google’s auto services that are currently outside the scope of the DMA. Allegations that Microsoft uses Office 365 to benefit products like Teams and its cloud services are not in scope for the DMA, but they are for the FCO.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
Apple Still Trying to Reverse Epic Antitrust Loss at Supreme Court

Report from Reuters In Brief – Apple has asked the US Supreme Court to review a lower court ruling that found the company in civil contempt for violating an injunction tied to its long-running legal fight with Epic Games. The Apple v Epic antitrust dispute began in...

Trump Cancels Executive Order on “Voluntary” AI Security Reviews

Report from the Washington Post In Brief – President Donald Trump cancelled signing a major executive order on artificial intelligence after last-minute lobbying from leading tech industry figures, including Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and former White House AI...

X Commits to Strengthen Anti-Terror Content Moderation in the UK

Report from The Guardian In Brief – Ofcom, the UK regulator enforcing the Online Safety Act (OSA), has announced that X has agreed to strengthen its moderation of terrorist and hate-related content. The commitments stem from Ofcom’s discussions with the top social...

Meta Joins Snap, TikTok and YouTube to Settle School District Lawsuit

Report from the New York Times In Brief – Meta has reached reached a settlement agreement in the first lawsuit headed to trial in federal court over claims that addiction to social media platforms has pushed public schools to spend massive sums fighting a youth mental...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required