bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

German Court Appears Likely to Reject Apple’s Challenge to Special Antitrust Standard

Feb 12, 2025

Report from Bloomberg

In Brief – Apple’s legal challenge to the German Federal Cartel Office (FCO) designation that they are a digital company “of paramount significance on competition across markets” appears to face skeptical judges on the Federal Court of Justice in Karlsruhe, the country’s top civil court. Apple is one of five digital giants, along with Google, Meta, Amazon, and Microsoft, that are covered by Section 19(a) of the German Competition Act that enables the country’s competition regulator to prohibit the largest digital companies from undermining competition in any market in which they operate. The law requires the FCO to first determine if a digital company meets the standard of having paramount significant across markets, and then the agency can establish rules to protect competition in the markets they occupy, such as prohibiting preferential treatment for their own services or hindering interoperability. The FCO ruled in April 2023 that Apple was so designated, but the iPhone giant challenged the determination arguing that the FCO did not present an accurate picture of the hardware market in Germany and the competition that Apple faced. In the hearing, Presiding Judge Wolfgang Kirchhoff cited a long list of reasons why Apple likely qualifies for tighter regulation under Section 19(a), including its financial power, its market shares, and the fact that it bundles its hardware and software products.

Context – The German law allowing the FCO to regulate digital giants was a harbinger of the EU’s Digital Markets Act. Some German officials have questioned the DMA for being too limited in the types of conduct they can address. While there are seven DMA “gatekeepers”, only 24 of their designated “core platform services” are covered by the law. Section 19(a) authority allows the FCO to regulate any service of a designated digital giant. For example, the FCO used its authority to regulate Google’s auto services that are currently outside the scope of the DMA. Allegations that Microsoft uses Office 365 to benefit products like Teams and its cloud services are not in scope for the DMA, but they are for the FCO.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
European Commission Issues AI Content Notification Rules

Report from MediaPost In Brief – The AI transparency rules required by Article 50 of the EU’s AI Act have taken effect, requiring companies to clearly disclose when users are interacting with artificial intelligence or viewing AI-generated or manipulated images, audio...

More Follow-On Lawsuits for Google Likely After Latest DMA Fine

Report from Reuters In Brief – European lawyers and litigation financiers say that the European Commission’s recent decision to fine Google $1 billion for violating the Digital Markets Act (DMA) may add to the wave of private antitrust lawsuits that the search giant...

More Really Smart Tech People Call for International AI Governance

Report from the Washington Post In Brief – OpenAI and Anthropic have endorsed a petition urging the US government to help create an international regime to slow down and regulate the pace of “automated AI development.” It is signed by over 1,200 “employees of frontier...

Judge Dismisses Google’s DMCA Search Scraping Lawsuit

Report from MediaPost In Brief – Federal District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers has dismissed Google's complaint against the Texas-based company SerpApi for allegedly violating the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) anti-circumvention provisions by evading...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required