bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Federal Judge Questions Whether Chatbots Engage in Speech in Character AI Lawsuit

May 5, 2025

Report from The Verge

In Brief – Federal District Judge Anne Conway rejected the efforts of AI companion chatbot service Character AI and Google to dismiss a lawsuit filed by the mother of a teenage user of the service who committed suicide. Conway, who largely rejected the companies’ First Amendment-based arguments and waived away precedents related to videogames, social media, and other expressive mediums that granted their operators free speech rights, said in her order that she is “not prepared to hold that Character AI’s output is speech”. Although Google does not own Character AI, the judge ruled that the digital giant will remain a defendant in the case due to the many links to the companion chatbot company, including that company’s founders were former Google employees who were eventually rehired by Google, and that the chatbot’s service operates on Google’s cloud service. Other claims the judge is allowing to proceed include alleging deceptive trade practices for not being clear that the chatbot characters are not real people and that Character AI negligently violated a rule meant to prevent adults from communicating sexually with minors online.

Context – Alleged harm to young users from engaging with AI “companions” is an AI industry version of what many critics see as the worst of social media. Most objectionable content on the social media platforms is created by other users and therefore the companies are generally protected from liability by Sec. 230. Critics have therefore been resorting to legislation and lawsuits targeting so-called “addictive” social media features. State laws trying to ban or otherwise regulate those features are facing skeptical federal judges, but, like in this case, the liability lawsuits are having much better luck with judges. Furthermore, the application of Sec. 230 to AI services is a huge open question, with Justice Gorsuch openly skeptical back in 2023. However, a strong argument can be made that everything created by a generative AI chatbot is just an advanced algorithmic re-ordering of existing third-party content.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
Swedish Court Orders Google to Pay Klarna Nearly $2 Billion in Damages

Report from EuroNews In Brief – Sweden’s Patent and Market Court has ruled in the antitrust damages case between comparison shopping site PriceRunner, which is owned by Sweden-based fintech company Klarna, and Google, ordering the US giant to pay 14.3 billion Swedish...

Trump Administration Lifts Export Ban on Top Anthropic Models

Report from the New York Times In Brief – The Trump administration lifted export restrictions that it had imposed on June 12th prohibiting Anthropic from allowing any foreign nationals from accessing it’s top AI models, allowing the company to restore access to Claude...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required