bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Federal Judge Hammers Apple for Violating Her App Store Fees Court Order

May 5, 2025

Report from the Wall Street Journal

In Brief – Federal Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers hammered Apple for violating her 2021 unfair competition ruling related to App Store restrictions, issued an order prohibiting Apple from charging any fees on any in-app sales made by app developers outside of Apple’s payments service, and took the extraordinary step of referring Apple’s conduct to federal prosecutors for a criminal contempt investigation. “Apple willfully chose not to comply with this court’s injunction,” Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said, specifically chiding CEO Tim Cook, and alleging misconduct by other company executives. Judge Rogers’ order is the latest in a legal dispute kicked off in 2020 when the giant game developer Epic Games sued Apple for monopolizing in-app payments on the iPhone. In 2021, Rogers found in Apple’s favor on the federal antitrust claims but ruled that the iPhone maker had violated California’s unfair competition law by prohibiting app developers from informing their users of alternative ways to buy app content outside the App Store, and issued a one-page nationwide order requiring Apple to stop those practices. Apple eventually instituted new App Store processes that extensively warned users if they pursued prompts from app developers to engage in purchases outside of Apple’s payments system, as well as charging those app developers a 27% commission, barely less than their regular 30% fee. Apple says it will comply with, and appeal, the latest order.

Context – Despite ruling that Apple did not violate federal antitrust law, Judge Rogers has been consistently skeptical that the company deserves a 30% commission rate. In a hearing last year, she called the fees a “windfall”, to which an Apple witness said, “We are running a business.” From the start, we’ve been saying that Epic’s lawsuits and other app developer complaints about in-app payments were always disingenuous. The issue was fees. App developers want much lower fees. In Europe, the DMA regulators are pressing the same issue. Rather than regulate nuanced Apple policies, Judge Rogers has ordered that they can no longer charge any fees on any purchases outside their payments system. And Apple won their antitrust case.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
Apple Still Trying to Reverse Epic Antitrust Loss at Supreme Court

Report from Reuters In Brief – Apple has asked the US Supreme Court to review a lower court ruling that found the company in civil contempt for violating an injunction tied to its long-running legal fight with Epic Games. The Apple v Epic antitrust dispute began in...

Trump Cancels Executive Order on “Voluntary” AI Security Reviews

Report from the Washington Post In Brief – President Donald Trump cancelled signing a major executive order on artificial intelligence after last-minute lobbying from leading tech industry figures, including Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and former White House AI...

X Commits to Strengthen Anti-Terror Content Moderation in the UK

Report from The Guardian In Brief – Ofcom, the UK regulator enforcing the Online Safety Act (OSA), has announced that X has agreed to strengthen its moderation of terrorist and hate-related content. The commitments stem from Ofcom’s discussions with the top social...

Meta Joins Snap, TikTok and YouTube to Settle School District Lawsuit

Report from the New York Times In Brief – Meta has reached reached a settlement agreement in the first lawsuit headed to trial in federal court over claims that addiction to social media platforms has pushed public schools to spend massive sums fighting a youth mental...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required