bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

California Enacts Law Regulating AI Chatbot Companion Services

Oct 1, 2025

Report from The Verge

In Brief – California has enacted legislation requiring companion chatbot developers to implement safeguards so that users are not misled into believing that they are interacting with a human. The measure requires a clear and conspicuous notification to users and requires that companion chatbot operators make annual reports to the Office of Suicide Prevention about safeguards they’ve put in place “to detect, remove, and respond to instances of suicidal ideation by users.” In his statement accompanying signing the bill, Governor Gavin Newsome (D) said, “We can continue to lead in AI and technology, but we must do it responsibly — protecting our children every step of the way. Our children’s safety is not for sale.” The chatbot bill was signed into law along with a collection of other digital and AI measures, including mandated warning labels for social media platforms, a device-based age verification mandate that will put Apple and Google at the center of enforcing age limits for mobile apps, new transparency duties for developers of large AI models, and changing civil liability law to reduce the ability of an AI developer or user to employ a defense in a liability case arguing that an AI system acted autonomously in harming someone.

Context – Alleged harms to young users from engaging with AI “companions” seems to be an AI version of the worst of social media. Those platforms are largely shielded from liability for objectionable content by Sec. 230, so critics have been resorting to legislation and lawsuits targeting platform characteristics like auto-play that they allege addict young users. The laws are facing skeptical federal judges, but the lawsuits are having more luck. Whether Sec. 230 applies to content created by generative AI is an open question, with Supreme Court Justice Gorsuch opining that it probably does not, as have Sec. 230’s congressional authors, but a strong argument can be made that everything created by a generative AI chatbot is just an algorithmic re-ordering of existing third-party content. Newsome vetoed a tougher AI chatbot companion bill that required companies to block teens under 18 if they could not guarantee that their chatbots would block objectionable content.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
Apple Still Trying to Reverse Epic Antitrust Loss at Supreme Court

Report from Reuters In Brief – Apple has asked the US Supreme Court to review a lower court ruling that found the company in civil contempt for violating an injunction tied to its long-running legal fight with Epic Games. The Apple v Epic antitrust dispute began in...

Trump Cancels Executive Order on “Voluntary” AI Security Reviews

Report from the Washington Post In Brief – President Donald Trump cancelled signing a major executive order on artificial intelligence after last-minute lobbying from leading tech industry figures, including Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and former White House AI...

X Commits to Strengthen Anti-Terror Content Moderation in the UK

Report from The Guardian In Brief – Ofcom, the UK regulator enforcing the Online Safety Act (OSA), has announced that X has agreed to strengthen its moderation of terrorist and hate-related content. The commitments stem from Ofcom’s discussions with the top social...

Meta Joins Snap, TikTok and YouTube to Settle School District Lawsuit

Report from the New York Times In Brief – Meta has reached reached a settlement agreement in the first lawsuit headed to trial in federal court over claims that addiction to social media platforms has pushed public schools to spend massive sums fighting a youth mental...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required