bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Brazil Tariff Threats Linked to Internet Policies and Bolsonaro Trial

Jul 1, 2025

Report from The Hill

In Brief – Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has announced that he backs the Brazilian Supreme Court’s (STF) decision to increase the liability of social media platforms in the country for content posted by their users, which has become a focal point of claims by populist critics of the government, backers of former president Jair Bolsonaro, and US President Donald Trump. Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who is at the center of the court’s actions, has been heavily criticized by conservative activists in the US and Brazil and recently had his US visa was revoked, as have other court justices. When President Trump announced his intention to impose a 50% tariff on Brazilian exports to the United States starting on August 1, he linked the action to what he called the “witch-hunt” trial against Bolsonaro, who is accused of trying to engineer a coup after losing the 2022 election. Lula describes US claims that Brazil runs a major trade surplus “inaccurate” and said that Brazil was prepared to respond with retaliatory measures under the country’s recently enacted Economic Reciprocity Law.

Context – Of all the Trump Administration’s bilateral tariff standoffs, the one with Brazil might have digital policy most centrally positioned. Even more than with the EU. USTR recently launched a Section 301 investigation into “unfair” trading practices by Brazil focusing on Brazilian treatment of digital services and electronic payments. The conflict with Justice Moraes runs deep. In February, President Trump’s own Trump Media & Technology Group, which runs Truth Social, and Rumble, a conservative online video site, sued Moraes in US federal court accusing him of illegally censoring political discourse in the US. Last year, Moraes was involved in a lengthy legal and rhetorical standoff with X and Elon Musk, which temporarily led to the platform being shut down in the country. Although that probably doesn’t matter as much to the bilateral relationship now. Finally, the Brazilian High Court recently paired back key provisions of the Marco Civil da Internet, Brazil’s groundbreaking Internet bill of rights enacted in 2014, which has been widely lauded for promoting free speech online.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
Apple Still Trying to Reverse Epic Antitrust Loss at Supreme Court

Report from Reuters In Brief – Apple has asked the US Supreme Court to review a lower court ruling that found the company in civil contempt for violating an injunction tied to its long-running legal fight with Epic Games. The Apple v Epic antitrust dispute began in...

Trump Cancels Executive Order on “Voluntary” AI Security Reviews

Report from the Washington Post In Brief – President Donald Trump cancelled signing a major executive order on artificial intelligence after last-minute lobbying from leading tech industry figures, including Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and former White House AI...

X Commits to Strengthen Anti-Terror Content Moderation in the UK

Report from The Guardian In Brief – Ofcom, the UK regulator enforcing the Online Safety Act (OSA), has announced that X has agreed to strengthen its moderation of terrorist and hate-related content. The commitments stem from Ofcom’s discussions with the top social...

Meta Joins Snap, TikTok and YouTube to Settle School District Lawsuit

Report from the New York Times In Brief – Meta has reached reached a settlement agreement in the first lawsuit headed to trial in federal court over claims that addiction to social media platforms has pushed public schools to spend massive sums fighting a youth mental...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required