bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Brazil Tariff Threats Linked to Internet Policies and Bolsonaro Trial

Jul 1, 2025

Report from The Hill

In Brief – Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has announced that he backs the Brazilian Supreme Court’s (STF) decision to increase the liability of social media platforms in the country for content posted by their users, which has become a focal point of claims by populist critics of the government, backers of former president Jair Bolsonaro, and US President Donald Trump. Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who is at the center of the court’s actions, has been heavily criticized by conservative activists in the US and Brazil and recently had his US visa was revoked, as have other court justices. When President Trump announced his intention to impose a 50% tariff on Brazilian exports to the United States starting on August 1, he linked the action to what he called the “witch-hunt” trial against Bolsonaro, who is accused of trying to engineer a coup after losing the 2022 election. Lula describes US claims that Brazil runs a major trade surplus “inaccurate” and said that Brazil was prepared to respond with retaliatory measures under the country’s recently enacted Economic Reciprocity Law.

Context – Of all the Trump Administration’s bilateral tariff standoffs, the one with Brazil might have digital policy most centrally positioned. Even more than with the EU. USTR recently launched a Section 301 investigation into “unfair” trading practices by Brazil focusing on Brazilian treatment of digital services and electronic payments. The conflict with Justice Moraes runs deep. In February, President Trump’s own Trump Media & Technology Group, which runs Truth Social, and Rumble, a conservative online video site, sued Moraes in US federal court accusing him of illegally censoring political discourse in the US. Last year, Moraes was involved in a lengthy legal and rhetorical standoff with X and Elon Musk, which temporarily led to the platform being shut down in the country. Although that probably doesn’t matter as much to the bilateral relationship now. Finally, the Brazilian High Court recently paired back key provisions of the Marco Civil da Internet, Brazil’s groundbreaking Internet bill of rights enacted in 2014, which has been widely lauded for promoting free speech online.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
Snap Settles Latest Social Media Addiction Teen Bellwether Lawsuit

Report from The Hill In Brief – Snapchat has settled claims from two teen plaintiffs alleging that the platform was intentionally designed to be addictive to young users, ending a high-profile Los Angeles trial two days before opening arguments. The plaintiffs, from...

EU Commission Wants Frontex to Monitor Online Immigration Content

Report from The Next Web In Brief – The European Commission has proposed giving Frontex, the EU’s border agency, authority to monitor social media posts about migration and flag problematic content. The proposal, included in a broader Frontex overhaul, would establish...

DC Attorney General Joins Thirteen States Suing TikTok Over Safety

Report from Fox 5 In Brief – The District of Columbia has joined the litigation efforts of 13 states suing TikTok, accusing the social media platform of harming children through intentionally addictive design, deceptive claims about user safety, and other violations...

Social Media Giants Lose Challenge Against Ofcom Information Demands

Report from Courthouse News In Brief – The High Court in London has rejected legal challenges by Meta, TikTok and X against demands from Britain’s online safety regulator, Ofcom, for information about how the platforms moderate harmful content. The ruling backs the...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required