bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Brazil Steps Back from Digital Services Tax in Face of Trump Tariff Threats

Apr 1, 2025

Report from Reuters

In Brief – The Brazilian government has shelved the plan it announced last September to enact a new tax on big tech firms in 2025. The measure, which was expected to mostly impact US-based digital giants like Amazon, Google, and Meta, was expected to be a Brazilian Digital Services Tax (DST). The decision was reportedly taken to avoid exacerbating trade frictions with the US as the Trump Administration plans to raise tariffs on countries that impose trade barriers on US companies. As part of the President’s “America First” trade policy, he has threatened tariff retaliation against countries that impose digital taxes that disproportionately impact US businesses. The Brazilian government is reportedly going to instead focus its technology policy efforts on advancing digital competition legislation that went to public consultation in January 2024 and targets practices such as “killer acquisitions” and the privileging of a company’s own products or services in search results.

Context – During the first Trump Administration, France created the first DST to increase taxes on the biggest internet businesses. Most were US companies. Other countries followed suit. President Trump responded with tariff threats, the DSTs were delayed, and talks moved to the OECD. The second Trump Administration came out of the gate with executive orders on January 20 opposing the OECD plan led by President Biden and signaling that he would again fight DSTs with tariffs. India, like Brazil, is signaling a willingness to step back on its DST, while Poland is moving forward. If the Brazilian Government does shift its focus to ratcheting up regulation of the same US giants that it had planned to tax, the move may still be used as justification for new US tariffs in line with a further White House directive in March that broadly threatens trade retaliation against any tax or regulatory actions that are “discriminatory, disproportionate, or designed to transfer significant funds or intellectual property from American companies to the foreign government or the foreign government’s favored domestic entities.”

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
Apple Still Trying to Reverse Epic Antitrust Loss at Supreme Court

Report from Reuters In Brief – Apple has asked the US Supreme Court to review a lower court ruling that found the company in civil contempt for violating an injunction tied to its long-running legal fight with Epic Games. The Apple v Epic antitrust dispute began in...

Trump Cancels Executive Order on “Voluntary” AI Security Reviews

Report from the Washington Post In Brief – President Donald Trump cancelled signing a major executive order on artificial intelligence after last-minute lobbying from leading tech industry figures, including Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and former White House AI...

X Commits to Strengthen Anti-Terror Content Moderation in the UK

Report from The Guardian In Brief – Ofcom, the UK regulator enforcing the Online Safety Act (OSA), has announced that X has agreed to strengthen its moderation of terrorist and hate-related content. The commitments stem from Ofcom’s discussions with the top social...

Meta Joins Snap, TikTok and YouTube to Settle School District Lawsuit

Report from the New York Times In Brief – Meta has reached reached a settlement agreement in the first lawsuit headed to trial in federal court over claims that addiction to social media platforms has pushed public schools to spend massive sums fighting a youth mental...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required