bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Brazil Steps Back from Digital Services Tax in Face of Trump Tariff Threats

Apr 1, 2025

Report from Reuters

In Brief – The Brazilian government has shelved the plan it announced last September to enact a new tax on big tech firms in 2025. The measure, which was expected to mostly impact US-based digital giants like Amazon, Google, and Meta, was expected to be a Brazilian Digital Services Tax (DST). The decision was reportedly taken to avoid exacerbating trade frictions with the US as the Trump Administration plans to raise tariffs on countries that impose trade barriers on US companies. As part of the President’s “America First” trade policy, he has threatened tariff retaliation against countries that impose digital taxes that disproportionately impact US businesses. The Brazilian government is reportedly going to instead focus its technology policy efforts on advancing digital competition legislation that went to public consultation in January 2024 and targets practices such as “killer acquisitions” and the privileging of a company’s own products or services in search results.

Context – During the first Trump Administration, France created the first DST to increase taxes on the biggest internet businesses. Most were US companies. Other countries followed suit. President Trump responded with tariff threats, the DSTs were delayed, and talks moved to the OECD. The second Trump Administration came out of the gate with executive orders on January 20 opposing the OECD plan led by President Biden and signaling that he would again fight DSTs with tariffs. India, like Brazil, is signaling a willingness to step back on its DST, while Poland is moving forward. If the Brazilian Government does shift its focus to ratcheting up regulation of the same US giants that it had planned to tax, the move may still be used as justification for new US tariffs in line with a further White House directive in March that broadly threatens trade retaliation against any tax or regulatory actions that are “discriminatory, disproportionate, or designed to transfer significant funds or intellectual property from American companies to the foreign government or the foreign government’s favored domestic entities.”

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
Yelp Wins Legal Ruling in Antitrust Battle with Google

Report from Courthouse News Service In Brief – Federal Magistrate Judge Susan Van Keulen has ruled that Yelp, a leading internet company critic of Google’s search practices, can rely on District Judge Amit Mehta’s 2024 decision in the Justice Department’s landmark...

Illinois Governor Signs Robust AI “Safety” Law

Report from CBS News In Brief – Illinois Governor JB Pritzker (D) has signed the AI Safety Measures Act into law pushing the state to the forefront of AI regulation. The law imposes “safety” requirements on companies developing so-called frontier AI models, including...

Japan Moving to Regulate Social Media and AI in Election Campaigns

Report from Nippon.com In Brief – Japan's House of Representatives, the lower chamber of the Diet, has approved two bills by a majority vote that are intended to address the misuse of social media during election campaigns. The bills, which must next be considered by...

UK CMA Joins the Apple and Google App Store Global Regulation Parade

Report from Reuters In Brief – Britain’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has announced its proposed new regulations to require Apple’s and Google’s app stores to allow app developers to direct users to third-party payment options to increase competition and...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required