bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Appeals Court Rejects Apple Effort to Pause District Court Setting App Fees

May 9, 2026

Report from 9to5Mac
In Brief – Epic Games has persuaded a panel of the federal 9th Circuit Court Appeals to reverse an earlier decision that had temporarily paused action in the district court that will determine the maximum level of fees Apple can charge app developers for in-app purchases. Previously, the appeals court had granted Apple a temporary stay as the iPhone giant again appealed to the Supreme Court in the case. However, Epic challenged Apple’s request for a pause as just a delaying tactic to avoid making changes to its fees. The panel of judges ultimately sided with the Fortnite developer, issuing an order that lifted the stay allowed the case to proceed, and saying that Apple failed to demonstrate that the Supreme Court was likely to take the case or that continuing district court proceedings to determine the permissible level of Apple fees on in-app payments would cause it irreparable harm.

Context – Epic’s 2020 antitrust lawsuits against Apple and Google kicked off a global campaign to drive down app store fees. Yes, it’s been six years, but they are winning. Google, with a more open ecosystem, lost. They have negotiated a global settlement with Epic for lower fees and a regime for secure third-party app stores that they are trying to sell to Judge James Donato. Apple prevailed over Epic on all the federal antitrust complaints but lost on a single charge under California’s Unfair Competition law. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, who made it clear all along that she thought Apple’s fees were too high, imposed an injunction on Apple that proved as restrictive as what Google faced after they lost across the board. Apple proposed lowering fees from 30% to 27%, which Gonzalez Rogers rejected out of hand and she imposed a contempt order on the company prohibiting fees on developers using non-Apple payments. The appeals court ruled that zero commissions went too far, saying “Apple is entitled to some compensation for the use of its intellectual property” and directed Gonzalez Rogers to determine that level. Until that determination is made, Apple collects zero developer fees on third-party payments.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
The Trump Administration’s Shifting View on AI Model Security Tests

Report from the New York Times In Brief – The Trump Administration is weighing a shift in policy to allow federal agencies to review advanced AI models, with officials discussing an executive order to establish an AI working group composed of government leaders and...

Big AI Industry Companies Reach Agreements with the Pentagon

Report from the Wall Street Journal In Brief – The US Defense Department has finalized agreements with eight major US technology companies to deploy their artificial intelligence tools in classified environments. The companies are OpenAI, Google, SpaceX (via xAI),...

US Department of Justice Joins xAI Lawsuit Challenging Colorado AI Law

Report from the Colorado Sun In Brief – The US Department of Justice has joined a lawsuit filed by xAI, the AI company owned by Elon Musk, seeking to block Colorado’s first-in-the-nation AI safety law from taking effect. Senate Bill 205, which was signed into law in...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required