bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Another Federal Appeals Court Upholds a Social Media Age Limit Law

Jul 11, 2026

Report from MediaPost
In Brief – A panel of the US 6th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that Ohio may enforce its 2023 social media parental-consent law, reversing a lower court decision that had blocked the measure as unconstitutional. The law requires teens under 16 to have parental permission to create accounts on social media platforms. In 2024, and again in 2025, a federal district judge agreed with industry group NetChoice that the law infringed on the First Amendment rights of minors and digital platforms. On appeal, Judges Eric Clay and Alice Batchelder sided with the State of Ohio that NetChoice lacked standing to assert the constitutional rights of minors and that the law merely regulates minors’ ability to enter contractual relationships.

Context – Last summer, the Supreme Court ruled that states could require porn websites to use age verification tools to confirm that users are adults, with six justices saying that ID checks were a long-established tool that warranted First Amendment “intermediate scrutiny”. Meanwhile, states have been passing laws regulating how social media platforms serve teens. Initially, most were blocked by federal judges applying “strict” First Amendment reviews. However, soon after the High Court’s decision on porn age checks, a federal appeals court panel in the US 5th Circuit allowed Mississippi’s teen-focused social media law to stand during litigation, and the Supreme Court rejected an emergency appeal. At the time, Justice Kavanaugh issued a concurring opinion summarizing why all the similar social media laws had been blocked and why he suspected Mississippi’s would eventually be blocked as well. Nevertheless, appeals panels of the 11th and 9th circuit’s later allowed similar laws to stand in Florida and California. They are now joined by the 6th. The issue is going to reach the Supreme Court. While the precedents backing the First Amendment rights of minors seem clear, the justices have been squirrely on internet cases, so who knows how this all plays out. Meanwhile, absent a First Amendment barrier, many countries are imposing blanket age limits on social media.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
European Commission Issues AI Content Notification Rules

Report from MediaPost In Brief – The AI transparency rules required by Article 50 of the EU’s AI Act have taken effect, requiring companies to clearly disclose when users are interacting with artificial intelligence or viewing AI-generated or manipulated images, audio...

More Follow-On Lawsuits for Google Likely After Latest DMA Fine

Report from Reuters In Brief – European lawyers and litigation financiers say that the European Commission’s recent decision to fine Google $1 billion for violating the Digital Markets Act (DMA) may add to the wave of private antitrust lawsuits that the search giant...

More Really Smart Tech People Call for International AI Governance

Report from the Washington Post In Brief – OpenAI and Anthropic have endorsed a petition urging the US government to help create an international regime to slow down and regulate the pace of “automated AI development.” It is signed by over 1,200 “employees of frontier...

Judge Dismisses Google’s DMCA Search Scraping Lawsuit

Report from MediaPost In Brief – Federal District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers has dismissed Google's complaint against the Texas-based company SerpApi for allegedly violating the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) anti-circumvention provisions by evading...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required