bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Another Call for the EU to Regulate Google Search – Spam Filter Edition

Apr 1, 2025

Report from Reuters

In Brief – ActMeraki, a German media company, has complained to EU antitrust regulators that a Google anti-spam policy that penalizes websites that sell part of their websites to other companies to improve the search results for the third-party content is an anticompetitive abuse of their dominant search service. Major European publisher and media trade groups are also calling for regulatory action against Google’s “site reputation abuse policy”. The search giant claims that their policy targets a practice dubbed “parasite SEO” in search optimization circles where an established publisher website sells to third parties the ability to independently publish their own content on a branch of the publisher’s main site so that the third-party page does better in Google’s search algorithm by riding on the host site’s established search ranking. A Google spokesperson defended the anti-spam policy saying, “We’ve heard very clearly from users that site reputation abuse – commonly referred to as ‘parasite SEO’ – leads to a bad search experience for users, and this policy update helps to crack down on this behavior.” ActMeraki says Google “continues to unilaterally set the rules of doing business online in its own favor, preferencing its own commercial offerings and depriving competing service providers of any visibility.”

Context – The “fairness” of Google search results has been a morass plaguing the Internet ecosystem for more than 20 years. Every algorithm change benefits some websites while others feel aggrieved. The European Commission’s Digital Markets Act (DMA) regulators spent a year reviewing Google’s plans to change search to mollify specialized “vertical search” services such as for flights, hotels, and local services, hearing complaints from all sides in stakeholder meetings, as every change means some sites fall as others rise. Google’s plan was eventually rejected. Talks will continue. And throughout, Google argues that they make changes to the complex search black box to benefit users. The EU regulators appear set to get into the mix and resolve disputes over how Google’s search service should operate. Search as a regulated utility.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
Apple Still Trying to Reverse Epic Antitrust Loss at Supreme Court

Report from Reuters In Brief – Apple has asked the US Supreme Court to review a lower court ruling that found the company in civil contempt for violating an injunction tied to its long-running legal fight with Epic Games. The Apple v Epic antitrust dispute began in...

Trump Cancels Executive Order on “Voluntary” AI Security Reviews

Report from the Washington Post In Brief – President Donald Trump cancelled signing a major executive order on artificial intelligence after last-minute lobbying from leading tech industry figures, including Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and former White House AI...

X Commits to Strengthen Anti-Terror Content Moderation in the UK

Report from The Guardian In Brief – Ofcom, the UK regulator enforcing the Online Safety Act (OSA), has announced that X has agreed to strengthen its moderation of terrorist and hate-related content. The commitments stem from Ofcom’s discussions with the top social...

Meta Joins Snap, TikTok and YouTube to Settle School District Lawsuit

Report from the New York Times In Brief – Meta has reached reached a settlement agreement in the first lawsuit headed to trial in federal court over claims that addiction to social media platforms has pushed public schools to spend massive sums fighting a youth mental...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required