bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Social Media Giants Lose Challenge Against Ofcom Information Demands

Nov 13, 2026

Report from Courthouse News
In Brief – The High Court in London has rejected legal challenges by Meta, TikTok and X against demands from Britain’s online safety regulator, Ofcom, for information about how the platforms moderate harmful content. The ruling backs the 2023 Online Safety Act (OSA) regime, which gives authorities broad powers to require technology companies to protect users, particularly children, from harmful and illegal material. In February, Ofcom requested a range of data from the platforms, including the volume of content moderated, response times, and the outcomes of user reports and appeals, dating back to 2024 to allow the regulator to assess whether harmful content was declining and regulatory interventions were effective. The companies argued that compliance would be excessive and costly. However, the judges found the companies had not provided sufficiently detailed evidence of their specific financial and staffing burdens, noted Ofcom had consulted the platforms and adjusted deadlines to reduce costs, and concluded the requests were proportionate to legitimate monitoring objectives. Meta expressed disappointment and maintained the demands exceeded what was necessary and proportionate.

Context – Over the past five years, while the UK has enacted a digital regulatory regime that parallels the EU’s, British leaders have often tried to pitch that the UK was more business friendly. Former PM Starmer said his government offered businesses “stability, pragmatism and the good sense they would expect from democratic British values.” The OSA, described by Ofcom as a “regulatory cousin” of the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA), gives the UK regulator the broad remit to “make online services safer” by requiring that “companies have effective systems in place to protect users” from a wide range of illegal and harmful content. Trump administration officials and US conservatives have criticized the OSA, and the DSA as well, for restricting freedom of expression online and placing excessive demands on US companies. The latest High Court decision does not resolve Meta’s separate legal challenge over how Ofcom calculates OSA regulatory fees and potential penalties.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
Snap Settles Latest Social Media Addiction Teen Bellwether Lawsuit

Report from The Hill In Brief – Snapchat has settled claims from two teen plaintiffs alleging that the platform was intentionally designed to be addictive to young users, ending a high-profile Los Angeles trial two days before opening arguments. The plaintiffs, from...

EU Commission Wants Frontex to Monitor Online Immigration Content

Report from The Next Web In Brief – The European Commission has proposed giving Frontex, the EU’s border agency, authority to monitor social media posts about migration and flag problematic content. The proposal, included in a broader Frontex overhaul, would establish...

DC Attorney General Joins Thirteen States Suing TikTok Over Safety

Report from Fox 5 In Brief – The District of Columbia has joined the litigation efforts of 13 states suing TikTok, accusing the social media platform of harming children through intentionally addictive design, deceptive claims about user safety, and other violations...

Meta Loses Appeal of Media Funding Antitrust Order in France

Report from Courthouse News In Brief – The Paris Court of Appeal has rejected Meta’s appeals of interim measures imposed by the French Competition Authority, upholding requirements that the social media giant negotiate fair rates with French publishers for using their...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required