bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Another Federal Appeals Court Upholds a Social Media Age Limit Law

Jul 11, 2026

Report from MediaPost
In Brief – A panel of the US 6th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that Ohio may enforce its 2023 social media parental-consent law, reversing a lower court decision that had blocked the measure as unconstitutional. The law requires teens under 16 to have parental permission to create accounts on social media platforms. In 2024, and again in 2025, a federal district judge agreed with industry group NetChoice that the law infringed on the First Amendment rights of minors and digital platforms. On appeal, Judges Eric Clay and Alice Batchelder sided with the State of Ohio that NetChoice lacked standing to assert the constitutional rights of minors and that the law merely regulates minors’ ability to enter contractual relationships.

Context – Last summer, the Supreme Court ruled that states could require porn websites to use age verification tools to confirm that users are adults, with six justices saying that ID checks were a long-established tool that warranted First Amendment “intermediate scrutiny”. Meanwhile, states have been passing laws regulating how social media platforms serve teens. Initially, most were blocked by federal judges applying “strict” First Amendment reviews. However, soon after the High Court’s decision on porn age checks, a federal appeals court panel in the US 5th Circuit allowed Mississippi’s teen-focused social media law to stand during litigation, and the Supreme Court rejected an emergency appeal. At the time, Justice Kavanaugh issued a concurring opinion summarizing why all the similar social media laws had been blocked and why he suspected Mississippi’s would eventually be blocked as well. Nevertheless, appeals panels of the 11th and 9th circuit’s later allowed similar laws to stand in Florida and California. They are now joined by the 6th. The issue is going to reach the Supreme Court. While the precedents backing the First Amendment rights of minors seem clear, the justices have been squirrely on internet cases, so who knows how this all plays out. Meanwhile, absent a First Amendment barrier, many countries are imposing blanket age limits on social media.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
Federal Trade Commission Proposes Policy on Personalized Pricing

Report from the Washington Post In Brief – The Federal Trade Commission has proposed exposing companies to federal charges if they secretly use personal data to vary prices based on what individual consumers are believed to be willing to pay. FTC Chairman Andrew...

Apple Will Change App Data Use Prompts to Settle German Probe

Report from Euractiv In Brief – Apple has settled an antitrust investigation by Germany’s competition authority by agreeing to redesign privacy prompts that third-party app developers show mobile users when seeking consent to use their data for targeted advertising....

Court Overturns Ban on Perplexity Shopping Agent Accessing Amazon

Report from MediaPost In Brief – A federal district court injunction barring Perplexity's AI shopping agent, Comet, from accessing Amazon has been overturned by an appeals panel of the US Ninth District that found it was unlikely that the AI company would be found to...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required