bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

New York Legislature Passes Bill Banning Data-Informed Pricing

Jun 27, 2026

Report from Gothamist
In Brief – The New York state legislature has passed a bill to prohibit most businesses from using consumers’ personal data to set individualized prices, a long-standing practice in ecommerce that critics call “surveillance pricing.” Backers say the legislation will stop discriminatory pricing while still preserving so-called “loyalty” and “rewards” programs” and “just for you” coupons, provided that customers voluntarily enroll for them and discounts are based on someone’s purchase history rather than broader personal data. Business groups and grocery industry representatives oppose the legislation and warn that its ambiguous language could undermine those popular discount programs and force them to be scaled back. The surveillance-pricing bill now awaits action by Governor Kathy Hochul (D) who has until the end of the year to sign or reject the measure.

Context – Progressive tech industry critics have targeted “surveillance” and “algorithmic” pricing for years. Claims that AI will be used to supercharge the long-time ecommerce practice has led to a flood of state legislative proposals. One of the big dividing lines is between bills to prohibit the practice in physical stores and bills that also target online commerce. To be clear, there are no reports of any stores using surveillance, data and AI to apply in-store personalized pricing. It’s simply not a real thing and there are too many barriers to actually doing it to detail here. Nevertheless, attempts to ban in-store personalized pricing, and even electronic shelf price labels themselves, is being pursued by legislators looking for an AI issue. A bill banning electronic shelf labels was also moving in New York but failed to win an Assembly vote. To be clear, some manner of personalized prices has been a feature of online commerce for decades. People sometimes get lower offers, sometimes higher. Shockingly, people only like lower price offers. Earlier this year Maryland enacted a ban on personalized pricing in larger grocery stores but did not apply it broadly online. Connecticut, like the New York legislature, passed legislation broadly restricting pricing practices, online and offline. Colorado’s Governor recently vetoed a broad pricing bill.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
Apple Aims to Resolve App Store DMA Investigation with Lower Fees

Report from TechCrunch In Brief – Apple has unveiled a new lower-fee commission structure for apps in the EU in a bid to resolve its dispute with the European Commission over compliance with the Digital Markets Act. Apple’s top in-app purchase commission will be...

Meta and State AGs Settle Lawsuit for $18 Billion and Design Changes

Report from the Wall Street Journal In Brief – Meta has agreed to an $18 billion settlement with 48 state attorneys general, ending a major federal trial over allegations that Facebook and Instagram harmed teenagers and signaling how the top social media platforms may...

Gig Delivery Driver Regulation Battle Revving Up in New York City

Report from the Wall Street Journal In Brief – New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani is backing legislation to require Amazon, FedEx and other warehouse operators in the city to directly employ delivery workers rather than use subcontractors and other non-employees. Backers...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required