bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Meta Challenges UK Online Safety Act Fees and Fines Regime

May 23, 2026

Report from The Guardian
In Brief – Meta is challenging the methodology Ofcom, the UK’s communications regulator, uses to determine the regulatory fee and fines structure under the UK’s Online Safety Act (OSA). The fees that Ofcom charges regulated firms to fund the OSA’s regulatory process, as well as fines that could be imposed on a regulated company, are based on a company’s “Qualified Worldwide Revenues”. The fees are a percentage of QWR but apply only to businesses that made more than £250m globally the previous year. Meta is seeking judicial review in the UK High Court, contending that the approach is disproportionate and places an excessive share of Ofcom’s regulatory costs on large multinational technology firms with significant revenue outside the country. Meta argues that Ofcom fees and fines should be based on operations and revenues in the UK. Ofcom said its interpretation reflects a straightforward reading of the legislation and vowed to defend the regime.

Context – When the EU created their twin regulatory regimes for digital platforms in 2022, they established a way to pay for the Digital Services Act (DSA) but not the Digital Markets Act (DMA). The DSA fee is modeled on the supervisory fee regimes that fund bank regulators. The DSA fee regime applies only to very large digital platforms that are regulated directly by the European Commission, not to smaller platforms overseen by member state regulators. The DSA fee is based on global users and profits. Meta and Google have filed lawsuits challenging the funding EU mechanism. The two platforms, who reportedly pay a majority of the total DSA fees, argue that basing the contribution on profits imposes disproportionate burdens on a handful of platforms while allowing others, such as Amazon, Snap and X, to impose significant burdens on the regulator without paying into the enforcement kitty because they did not report net profits. The German Government has proposed creating a permanent DMA supervisory fee modeled after the DSA version, but the EU Commission has not backed the idea.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
AI Hallucination Stories Grab Bag

Context - Within weeks of Chat-GPT’s public release, the fact that chatbots make plausible and realistic sounding stuff up emerged. The AI scientists knew about the phenomenon, which they called “hallucinations”. It appears to be baked into the technology. LLMs don’t...

New York AG Opposes Surveillance Pricing and Electronic Shelf Labels

Report from WRVO In Brief – New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) is calling for state legislation to ban the use of personal data to influence prices, as well as a measure to prohibit grocery stores and pharmacies in the state from adopting digital shelf price...

Google Offers to Change Anti-Spam Policies to Appease EU Regulators

Report from Bloomberg In Brief – Google has reportedly made a proposal to European Commission digital regulators to change their search engine's anti-spam policy to downrank news publisher websites that engage in a practice dubbed “parasite SEO”. The move comes in...

Colorado Scales Back Its Big AI Safety Law

Report from Colorado Newsline In Brief – Colorado, which was the first state to enact comprehensive “AI Safety” legislation when it did so in 2024, was set to see it finally go into in go into effect in June, but instead the law has been frozen by a court...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required