bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

German Court Orders X to Share Platform Data on Hungarian Election Activity

Feb 28, 2026

Report from Euractiv
In Brief – The Berlin Court of Appeals has ordered social media platform X to give two Germany-based elections researchers access to data related to the reach and engagement with posts related to Hungary’s April 12 election. Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban is facing the biggest challenge to his rule since his Fidesz party took power in 2010. The decision is seen as a milestone in implementing the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA), which regulates how digital platforms deal with objectionable content. The law directs platforms to give researchers access to data to monitor risks including disinformation, hate speech and election manipulation. In response, Elon Musk posted, “We are open sourcing our algorithm. Not sure what more they want.”

Context – Many top conservative populists in the US have built alliances in Europe, with ties to Hungary being especially deep, and see the EU dominated by cultural and policy ecosystems akin to America’s progressive strongholds. Most conservative leaders believe that the top digital companies are products of the Bay Area’s progressive monoculture and discriminated against them as part of a US-Western European policy ecosystem of like-minded think tanks, advocacy groups, academics, researchers, foundations, media outlets, and government agencies. “Researchers” are not seen as neutrals. In January, the US State Department issued visa bans on five Europeans, including from research organizations that press platforms to counter so-called online hate and disinformation. The US Federal Trade Commission is engaged in legal battles with NewsGuard and Media Matters for America over similar activity. Europe, not constrained by the First Amendment, enacted the DSA regulating online content moderation far beyond what is possible in the US, drawing cheers from American progressives and derision from conservatives. The investigations of X are a top bilateral flashpoint. The Commission’s fine over X’s blue checkmark policy and advertiser transparency resulted in full-throated US censorship charges, and that’s not the truly political stuff about algorithms and content moderation still to come.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
EU Commission Accepts X’s Plan to Address DSA Transparency Concerns

Report from MediaPost In Brief – The European Commission has announced the approval of X’s plan to address several Digital Services Act (DSA) compliance shortcomings identified by the regulator. The decision follows the €120 million fine imposed on the social media...

TikTok’s Latest EU DSA Charges Allege Failing to Protect Minors

Report from Reuters In Brief – TikTok faces fresh allegations from the European Commission that its platform design violates the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA) by failing to adequately protect minors. The preliminary findings mark the fourth DSA case opened against...

New Jersey Bans So-Called “Surveillance Pricing” for Groceries

Report from NJ.Com In Brief – New Jersey Gov. Mikie Sherrill (D) has signed the Fair Price Protection Act, banning grocery stores and third-party grocery delivery platforms from using consumers' personal data to set or vary food prices. Sherrill said the measure will...

France Officially Sets 15-Year-Old Age Threshold for Social Media

Report from the New York Times In Brief – France has become the first European country to fully approve a nationwide ban on social media for children under 15, with the law expected to take effect as early as Sept. 1. Passed by large majorities in both houses of the...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required