bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Top Irish Court Rejects X’s Attempt to Avoid National Online Safety Regime

Aug 1, 2025

Report from Euractiv

In Brief – The Irish High Court has rejected X’s legal challenge arguing that the Irish Online Safety Code should not apply to it because it conflicted with the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA) that regulates how digital platforms address illegal and objectionable online content. Ireland’s Online Safety Code, enforced by the country’s digital services regulator, directs video-sharing platforms such as X to implement age checks to restrict access to pornographic and violent content. X, which has its European headquarters in Ireland, but is primarily regulated under the DSA by the European Commission due to its designation as a Very Large Online Platform (VLOP), claimed that the Irish video code was incompatible with obligations under the DSA, and the EU’s Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD). However, the Irish High Court ruled that the Irish code’s provisions on protecting minors online, such as requiring age checks, “are within the vires of the AVMSD… and are entirely complementary to the DSA and not in conflict with it.”

Context – The tidal wave of online verification is only accelerating. Like in Ireland, pornography is generally the first target, but calls to add social media often follow, such as in FranceGreat Britain, and the US. And X has porn on it, as did Twitter. Australia’s 16-year-old age limit for social media begins in December. That country will require age checks for search engines as well. The Irish court ruling also reinforces how dated is the perception that Ireland is an EU regulatory haven for digital businesses. Irish data security regulators were lambasted by privacy advocates for years for supposed business-friendly rulings under the GDPR’s One-Stop-Shop regime. Irish regulators were a big reason that method of streamlined regulatory compliance was largely jettisoned from subsequent EU digital laws, including the DSA, the DMA, and the AI Act, putting the Commission in the regulatory driver’s seat for the biggest platforms. But as we’re seeing with AI regulation, regulatory overlaps continue to crop up, reinforcing concerns with inconsistent and restrictive EU regulation that were given voice in last year’s Draghi Report.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
Federal Trade Commission Proposes Policy on Personalized Pricing

Report from the Washington Post In Brief – The Federal Trade Commission has proposed exposing companies to federal charges if they secretly use personal data to vary prices based on what individual consumers are believed to be willing to pay. FTC Chairman Andrew...

Apple Will Change App Data Use Prompts to Settle German Probe

Report from Euractiv In Brief – Apple has settled an antitrust investigation by Germany’s competition authority by agreeing to redesign privacy prompts that third-party app developers show mobile users when seeking consent to use their data for targeted advertising....

Court Overturns Ban on Perplexity Shopping Agent Accessing Amazon

Report from MediaPost In Brief – A federal district court injunction barring Perplexity's AI shopping agent, Comet, from accessing Amazon has been overturned by an appeals panel of the US Ninth District that found it was unlikely that the AI company would be found to...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required