bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Robby Starbuck Settles with Meta on AI Defamation and Will Advise on Bias

Aug 1, 2025

Report from the Wall Street Journal

In Brief – Robby Starbuck, a conservative activist who has pressured companies to change their DEI practices, has settled a defamation lawsuit he brought against Meta that alleged the company’s AI tool smeared him by falsely asserting he participated in the January 6 riot and that he was linked to QAnon. Starbuck will serve as an advisor to Meta on how it can mitigate ideological and political bias in its AI tools. In April, in a lengthy blog post that preceded the Starbuck matter, Meta detailed the development, training and operations of its openly available Llama AI models, and said that leading LLMs “historically have leaned left when it comes to debated political and social topics” based on the how they have been trained, and that the company’s goal was “to remove bias from our AI models”.

Context – On the issue of AI hallucinations as defamation, the first major lawsuit, a Georgia state court case involving ChatGPT, was recently dismissed, with the judge noting in her order that OpenAI worked hard to reduce errors and extensively warns users that its system could make them. That said, ideological bias and “hallucinations” are different things. The initial Starbuck complaint about untrue statements seemed like a hallucination suit. However, bias, especially as defined by Meta, is about intentional answers due to training data sets being skewed in ways that some people could consider ideological, reinforcement learning methods that some could see as ideological, and “guardrails” that all companies use to limit or direct AI models that can seem biased. No digital issue unites conservatives more than the view that content moderation on the big digital platforms has been slanted against conservative viewpoints because the main companies operate in what is perceived as a progressive monoculture in the Bay Area. Similar ideological bias within AI chatbots, especially ChatGPT, quickly became a point of contention and the Trump AI Action Plan includes an executive order against “Woke AI”. Of course, everything about bias is subjective without agreement between left and right. Different platform options seems the best antidote.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
EU Commission Has Plan to Tax Tech Giants by Taxing Giant Companies

Report from the Financial Times In Brief – The European Commission is examining a plan to impose a big annual lump-sum levy on the largest, most profitable companies operating in Europe as a way to tax the US-based tech giants without imposing a direct tax on just...

Clearview AI’s Privacy Law Battle with the UK ICO Continues

Report from PPC Land In Brief – Clearview AI, the small US company that built a facial recognition database using images collected online, argued to the Court of Appeal in London that the UK Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) lacks authority to enforce data...

Australian Government Introduces Its Digital Duty of Care Legislation

Report from the Digital Watch In Brief – Australia’s Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill 2026 has been introduced in the House of Representatives by the Albanese Government. The bill proposes requiring digital services to maintain a safe environment,...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required