bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Polish Comparison-Shopping Site Sues Google for Years of Damages

Jan 12, 2025

Report from Reuters

In Brief – Google has been sued by Ceneo, a Poland-based comparison-shopping unit of European ecommerce platform Allegro, seeking 2.33 billion zlotys (about $568 million) for damages suffered at the hands of the digital giant from 2013 through 2024. The civil lawsuit filed in the District Court in Warsaw builds on the determination of the European Commission that Google favored its own comparison-shopping service, Google Shopping, in Google search results, disadvantaging comparison-shopping competitors. In September, the EU’s top court upheld the €2.42B fine imposed on Google by the Commission for this anti-competitive conduct. Ceneo’s claims consist of 1.72 billion zlotys for losses sustained by the company from 2013 through 2024, as well as interest payments of around 615 million zlotys related to the unpaid compensation during those years. Google issued a statement in response to the lawsuit saying, “Our Shopping remedy has been working successfully for several years and we continue to invest in formats that support brands, retailers and comparison shopping sites of all sizes across Poland and Europe.”

Context – The charge the Google was unfairly preferencing its own specialized “vertical” search services for products and services such as airfares, lodging, local services, and jobs, and penalizing vertical search competitors in Google’s general search engine, was the basis of the EU’s Google “Shopping” antitrust case involving its price comparison service. The fact it took well over a decade to complete the case, and companies competing against Google’s verticals continued to complain throughout, was a major impetus for the Digital Markets Act regulating dominant digital “gatekeepers”. The Commission has held regular DMA stakeholder forums aimed at finding an acceptable result balancing the interests of verticals providers and direct sellers, let alone consumers and possibly even Google itself. Regulating Google Search is likely to be a long-term employment contract in the Commission, let alone regulating the other seven Google “core platform services” as well.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
US Supreme Court Soundly Rejects Broad ISP Liability for User Piracy

Report from the New York Times In Brief – The Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that Cox Communications cannot be held liable for copyright infringement committed by its users, even if the company knows some customers engage in piracy and yet it does not cut them...

Tech Trade Group Challenges Chicago’s Social Media Tax

Report from the Chicago Sun-Times In Brief – NetChoice, a digital company trade group, is suing to block the City of Chicago’s new social media tax, arguing it violates the First Amendment and the federal Permanent Internet Tax Freedom Act (PITFA). The new tax extends...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required