bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

India Adds Deepfakes to Tightened Social Media Takedown Regime

Feb 21, 2026

Report from MediaNews4U

In Brief – India has amended its rules requiring social media platforms such as Meta, YouTube and X to remove unlawful material, adding AI-generated “deepfakes” to the regime. The new rules, which go into effect on February 20, bring AI-generated content under the 2021 Indian IT Act that applies to unlawful online information, and shortens the current 36-hour deadline for platforms to take down material to just three hours after receiving notice from government authorities. To address government concerns with “deepfakes”, the new regulations require social media platforms to obtain a user declaration before publishing content stating whether audio, visual, or audio-visual content that appears real is synthetically generated, and then requires the platforms to use “reasonable and appropriate technical measures,” including automated tools, to verify those user declarations. If content is confirmed to be synthetic, it must be clearly and prominently labeled. Companies must also embed permanent metadata or provenance markers, including unique identifiers where technically feasible, to trace the resource used to create or modify the material. India’s current IT law permits government authorities to issue broad content takedown orders, with tens of thousands issued in recent years. Critics say that shortening the time given to platforms to comply to just three hours will push them to adopt automated take-down processes rather than reviewing individual takedown orders.

Context – Social media companies have long dealt with governments, including democracies, who have seen content online that they don’t like and pushed platforms to police it. Social media regulation in Russia, Turkey, and India is easily criticized on censorship grounds, but Germany, France, and Australia were early adopters as well, and the EU’s Digital Services Act and UK Online Safety Bill have been criticized as justifying the mechanisms of online censorship. In practice, platform compliance appears closely linked to the perceived long-term economic value of the market in question.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
Brazil Orders Grok to Stop Sexualized Images

Report from DigWatch In Brief – Brazil has ordered X to stop AI chatbot Grok from generating sexualized images, adding to the global regulatory pressure on Elon Musk’s social media platform and AI chatbot. The directive, issued by Brazil’s National Data Protection...

French Retailers and Government Backers Resisting Online Marketplaces

Report from Reuters In Brief – France’s Minister of Small and Medium Businesses says Shein and other online retail platforms will face a “year of resistance" from traditional storefront retailers and their backers in the government. Serge Papin argued that retail...

Federal Jury Finds Uber Financially Liable for Driver Sexual Assault

Report from Bloomberg In Brief – A federal court jury in Arizona has ordered Uber to pay $8.5 million in damages to a young woman who was allegedly raped by her driver in 2023. The decision marks the first time Uber, which has been fighting such claims for a decade,...

EU Commission Directs Google to Play Nice with Chatbot Competitors

Report from Courthouse News In Brief – The European Commission has announced two “specification proceedings” to direct Google in setting policies related to third-party AI chatbot competitors that comply with its Digital Markets Act (DMA) obligations. One process...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required