bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Google’s Latest Offer to Change Vertical Search to Comply with EU DMA

Jul 1, 2025

Report from Reuters

In Brief – Google has proposed more changes to its search results to improve the visibility of “vertical” search competitors, such as those specializing in hotels, airfares, or local services, aiming to resolve the European Commission’s preliminary determination that the company was violating the Digital Markets Act (DMA). Vertical search services (VSS) have long complained that Google’s general search service penalizes vertical competitors and preferences the giant’s own vertical offerings. The DMA prohibits gatekeepers from self-preferencing. Despite months of Commission-led stakeholder talks involving Google, VSS providers, and large businesses who benefit from high rankings in Google Search, the regulator ruled in March that Google’s DMA plan did not comply. Google’s latest proposal involves using two vertical search results boxes, one from Google and one from a VSS, with each able to offer three links using the same format, information and features. Vertical search providers who did not win the ability to control the non-Google vertical box would then be ranked in the regular search results. Google’s latest proposal reiterates that it disagrees with the Commission’s preliminary findings but that they “want to find a workable solution to resolve the present proceedings.” The Commission has called a July 8 meeting to hear from rivals, some of whom claim that the changes still do not go far enough.

Context – Arguing over the “fairness” of Google search results has been a morass plaguing the Internet ecosystem for more than 20 years. Every search algorithm change benefits some websites while others feel aggrieved. Unlike in the EU, with the Google Shopping case and then the DMA, US regulators have rejected pursing complaints from vertical search businesses. However, Yelp, a long-time Google critic, is suing Google for anti-competitive treatment following the antitrust ruling by Federal Judge Amit Mehta that Google search was a monopoly. EU regulators are now in the mix to determine how Google search will operate, making it a kind of regulated utility there. Federal judges might soon try on the role in the US.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
US Supreme Court Soundly Rejects Broad ISP Liability for User Piracy

Report from the New York Times In Brief – The Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that Cox Communications cannot be held liable for copyright infringement committed by its users, even if the company knows some customers engage in piracy and yet it does not cut them...

Tech Trade Group Challenges Chicago’s Social Media Tax

Report from the Chicago Sun-Times In Brief – NetChoice, a digital company trade group, is suing to block the City of Chicago’s new social media tax, arguing it violates the First Amendment and the federal Permanent Internet Tax Freedom Act (PITFA). The new tax extends...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required