bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

European Hotels to Sue Booking for Retail Price Fixing Damages

Jul 1, 2025

Report from Reuters

In Brief – Hotel associations from 26 European markets plan to file a class-action lawsuit against Booking .com in the Netherlands over the platform’s long-time use of price parity contract clauses that prohibited hotels using the site from offering a lower price on other online sales channels including competing platforms and hotel’s own websites. The lawsuit follows a September ruling from the EU Court of Justice that questioned the legality of such clauses under EU antitrust law, stating that Booking failed to prove they were necessary or proportionate. The hotels hope to reclaim a significant portion of commissions paid to Booking between 2004 and 2024, potentially plus interest. Filing the lawsuit in the Netherlands, which is Booking’s country of establishment in the EU, allows all European hotels to consolidate their claims in a single jurisdiction through a single litigation. Booking responded to news of the pending suit by saying that the hotel trade groups are mistaken in their view of the ECJ ruling, claiming that the court only addressed a narrow legal question regarding contract clauses used in Germany between 2006 and 2016 and, even then, “did not conclude that Booking’s German parity price clauses were anti-competitive or had an effect on competition.” The online booking site added that it has already ended the use of such clauses in Europe to comply with the EU’s Digital Markets Act regardless.

Context – Price parity (or “MFN”) clauses of dominant digital platforms have been a regulatory concern for years, especially when used to limit lower-priced sales on competing digital platforms that charge sellers lower fees. Their use by hotel booking platforms has brought regulatory action in many global markets. Online food delivery platforms have also faced scrutiny. Amazon has an aggressive price parity track record as well. Booking, long the top hotel reservation intermediation platform, and a platform that has had many run-ins with antitrust regulators over their price parity policies, was the first DMA “gatekeeper” company added by the European Commission to the original six – Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft, and ByteDance.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
Dutch Regulator Opens Digital Services Act Investigation of Roblox

Report from NL Times In Brief – The Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) has launched a formal Digital Services Act (DSA) investigation of Roblox over concerns that the online gaming platform may not be doing enough to protect children. The DSA...

EU Commission Moves to Stop Meta from Banning Chatbots on WhatsApp

Report from Wall Street Journal In Brief – The European Commission has informed Meta that it plans to block the company’s ban on third-party AI chatbots from operating over WhatsApp. The antitrust regulator has reached a preliminary finding that Meta’s policy could...

Department of Justice and State AGs Appeal Google Search Remedies Order

Report from Bloomberg In Brief – The US Department of Justice has announced that it notified the Federal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia that it will appeal US District Judge Amit Mehta’s remedies order in the federal antitrust lawsuit that found Google...

Governor Newsome Drops Funding for Media from California State Budget

Report from SFiST In Brief – The latest budget proposal from California Governor Gavin Newsom (D) has eliminated funding for the News Transformation Fund, a state initiative to pay millions of dollars to California media companies. The fund was announced in 2024 as...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required