bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Deloitte Delivered Report to Australian Government Filled with AI Errors

Oct 1, 2025

Report from ABC News

In Brief – Consulting firm Deloitte Australia will refund part of the AU$440,000 ($290,000) it was paid by the Australian Government’s Department of Employment and Workplace Relations for a report assessing the agency’s use of automated welfare penalties after the document was found to include at least 20 fabrications and inaccuracies that appear to have been generated by an AI system. The initial 237-page report, which was posted on the agency’s website in July, included numerous false citations, references to non-existent academic papers, and a fabricated quote attributed to a federal judge who is a Sydney University professor of public and constitutional law. The errors were caught by a Sidney University researcher who was tipped off by the fabricated quote linked to a book the Sidney University law professor had not written. Deloitte confirmed that “some footnotes and references were incorrect” and that the “matter has been resolved directly with the client.” The company initially did not respond when asked if the errors were generated by AI, but later confirmed they were. The revised report, posted in October, disclosed that Microsoft’s Azure OpenAI system had been used in its preparation. The department said the core findings and recommendations remained unchanged.

Context – In July, a US district judge in New Jersey withdrew his decision in a biopharma securities case after lawyers pointed out that his opinion contained numerous errors, including made-up quotes and misstated case outcomes, that were very likely the product of AI. Chatbot “hallucinations” in legal briefs first made news in mid-2023, less than a year after ChatGPT’s release, with two lawyers being sanctioned in US District Court. Chief Justice John Roberts led off his 2023 Annual Report on the Federal Judiciary by discussing AI technology in the legal system, warned about hallucinations, and urged responsible use. The Judicial Office of the UK Ministry of Justice released similar AI guidance. Legal world hallucinations keep popping up. Of course, everyone knows that they need to check all AI work, but everyone also knows they should not drink and drive.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
European Commission Issues AI Content Notification Rules

Report from MediaPost In Brief – The AI transparency rules required by Article 50 of the EU’s AI Act have taken effect, requiring companies to clearly disclose when users are interacting with artificial intelligence or viewing AI-generated or manipulated images, audio...

More Follow-On Lawsuits for Google Likely After Latest DMA Fine

Report from Reuters In Brief – European lawyers and litigation financiers say that the European Commission’s recent decision to fine Google $1 billion for violating the Digital Markets Act (DMA) may add to the wave of private antitrust lawsuits that the search giant...

More Really Smart Tech People Call for International AI Governance

Report from the Washington Post In Brief – OpenAI and Anthropic have endorsed a petition urging the US government to help create an international regime to slow down and regulate the pace of “automated AI development.” It is signed by over 1,200 “employees of frontier...

Judge Dismisses Google’s DMCA Search Scraping Lawsuit

Report from MediaPost In Brief – Federal District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers has dismissed Google's complaint against the Texas-based company SerpApi for allegedly violating the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) anti-circumvention provisions by evading...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required