bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Polish Comparison-Shopping Site Sues Google for Years of Damages

Jan 12, 2025

Report from Reuters

In Brief – Google has been sued by Ceneo, a Poland-based comparison-shopping unit of European ecommerce platform Allegro, seeking 2.33 billion zlotys (about $568 million) for damages suffered at the hands of the digital giant from 2013 through 2024. The civil lawsuit filed in the District Court in Warsaw builds on the determination of the European Commission that Google favored its own comparison-shopping service, Google Shopping, in Google search results, disadvantaging comparison-shopping competitors. In September, the EU’s top court upheld the €2.42B fine imposed on Google by the Commission for this anti-competitive conduct. Ceneo’s claims consist of 1.72 billion zlotys for losses sustained by the company from 2013 through 2024, as well as interest payments of around 615 million zlotys related to the unpaid compensation during those years. Google issued a statement in response to the lawsuit saying, “Our Shopping remedy has been working successfully for several years and we continue to invest in formats that support brands, retailers and comparison shopping sites of all sizes across Poland and Europe.”

Context – The charge the Google was unfairly preferencing its own specialized “vertical” search services for products and services such as airfares, lodging, local services, and jobs, and penalizing vertical search competitors in Google’s general search engine, was the basis of the EU’s Google “Shopping” antitrust case involving its price comparison service. The fact it took well over a decade to complete the case, and companies competing against Google’s verticals continued to complain throughout, was a major impetus for the Digital Markets Act regulating dominant digital “gatekeepers”. The Commission has held regular DMA stakeholder forums aimed at finding an acceptable result balancing the interests of verticals providers and direct sellers, let alone consumers and possibly even Google itself. Regulating Google Search is likely to be a long-term employment contract in the Commission, let alone regulating the other seven Google “core platform services” as well.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
Dutch Regulator Opens Digital Services Act Investigation of Roblox

Report from NL Times In Brief – The Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) has launched a formal Digital Services Act (DSA) investigation of Roblox over concerns that the online gaming platform may not be doing enough to protect children. The DSA...

EU Commission Moves to Stop Meta from Banning Chatbots on WhatsApp

Report from Wall Street Journal In Brief – The European Commission has informed Meta that it plans to block the company’s ban on third-party AI chatbots from operating over WhatsApp. The antitrust regulator has reached a preliminary finding that Meta’s policy could...

Department of Justice and State AGs Appeal Google Search Remedies Order

Report from Bloomberg In Brief – The US Department of Justice has announced that it notified the Federal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia that it will appeal US District Judge Amit Mehta’s remedies order in the federal antitrust lawsuit that found Google...

Governor Newsome Drops Funding for Media from California State Budget

Report from SFiST In Brief – The latest budget proposal from California Governor Gavin Newsom (D) has eliminated funding for the News Transformation Fund, a state initiative to pay millions of dollars to California media companies. The fund was announced in 2024 as...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required