bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

German Court Appears Likely to Reject Apple’s Challenge to Special Antitrust Standard

Feb 12, 2025

Report from Bloomberg

In Brief – Apple’s legal challenge to the German Federal Cartel Office (FCO) designation that they are a digital company “of paramount significance on competition across markets” appears to face skeptical judges on the Federal Court of Justice in Karlsruhe, the country’s top civil court. Apple is one of five digital giants, along with Google, Meta, Amazon, and Microsoft, that are covered by Section 19(a) of the German Competition Act that enables the country’s competition regulator to prohibit the largest digital companies from undermining competition in any market in which they operate. The law requires the FCO to first determine if a digital company meets the standard of having paramount significant across markets, and then the agency can establish rules to protect competition in the markets they occupy, such as prohibiting preferential treatment for their own services or hindering interoperability. The FCO ruled in April 2023 that Apple was so designated, but the iPhone giant challenged the determination arguing that the FCO did not present an accurate picture of the hardware market in Germany and the competition that Apple faced. In the hearing, Presiding Judge Wolfgang Kirchhoff cited a long list of reasons why Apple likely qualifies for tighter regulation under Section 19(a), including its financial power, its market shares, and the fact that it bundles its hardware and software products.

Context – The German law allowing the FCO to regulate digital giants was a harbinger of the EU’s Digital Markets Act. Some German officials have questioned the DMA for being too limited in the types of conduct they can address. While there are seven DMA “gatekeepers”, only 24 of their designated “core platform services” are covered by the law. Section 19(a) authority allows the FCO to regulate any service of a designated digital giant. For example, the FCO used its authority to regulate Google’s auto services that are currently outside the scope of the DMA. Allegations that Microsoft uses Office 365 to benefit products like Teams and its cloud services are not in scope for the DMA, but they are for the FCO.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
Dutch Regulator Opens Digital Services Act Investigation of Roblox

Report from NL Times In Brief – The Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) has launched a formal Digital Services Act (DSA) investigation of Roblox over concerns that the online gaming platform may not be doing enough to protect children. The DSA...

EU Commission Moves to Stop Meta from Banning Chatbots on WhatsApp

Report from Wall Street Journal In Brief – The European Commission has informed Meta that it plans to block the company’s ban on third-party AI chatbots from operating over WhatsApp. The antitrust regulator has reached a preliminary finding that Meta’s policy could...

Department of Justice and State AGs Appeal Google Search Remedies Order

Report from Bloomberg In Brief – The US Department of Justice has announced that it notified the Federal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia that it will appeal US District Judge Amit Mehta’s remedies order in the federal antitrust lawsuit that found Google...

Governor Newsome Drops Funding for Media from California State Budget

Report from SFiST In Brief – The latest budget proposal from California Governor Gavin Newsom (D) has eliminated funding for the News Transformation Fund, a state initiative to pay millions of dollars to California media companies. The fund was announced in 2024 as...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required