bbieron@platformeconomyinsights.com

Federal Judge Questions Whether Chatbots Engage in Speech in Character AI Lawsuit

May 5, 2025

Report from The Verge

In Brief – Federal District Judge Anne Conway rejected the efforts of AI companion chatbot service Character AI and Google to dismiss a lawsuit filed by the mother of a teenage user of the service who committed suicide. Conway, who largely rejected the companies’ First Amendment-based arguments and waived away precedents related to videogames, social media, and other expressive mediums that granted their operators free speech rights, said in her order that she is “not prepared to hold that Character AI’s output is speech”. Although Google does not own Character AI, the judge ruled that the digital giant will remain a defendant in the case due to the many links to the companion chatbot company, including that company’s founders were former Google employees who were eventually rehired by Google, and that the chatbot’s service operates on Google’s cloud service. Other claims the judge is allowing to proceed include alleging deceptive trade practices for not being clear that the chatbot characters are not real people and that Character AI negligently violated a rule meant to prevent adults from communicating sexually with minors online.

Context – Alleged harm to young users from engaging with AI “companions” is an AI industry version of what many critics see as the worst of social media. Most objectionable content on the social media platforms is created by other users and therefore the companies are generally protected from liability by Sec. 230. Critics have therefore been resorting to legislation and lawsuits targeting so-called “addictive” social media features. State laws trying to ban or otherwise regulate those features are facing skeptical federal judges, but, like in this case, the liability lawsuits are having much better luck with judges. Furthermore, the application of Sec. 230 to AI services is a huge open question, with Justice Gorsuch openly skeptical back in 2023. However, a strong argument can be made that everything created by a generative AI chatbot is just an advanced algorithmic re-ordering of existing third-party content.

View By Monthly
Latest Blog
European Commission Issues AI Content Notification Rules

Report from MediaPost In Brief – The AI transparency rules required by Article 50 of the EU’s AI Act have taken effect, requiring companies to clearly disclose when users are interacting with artificial intelligence or viewing AI-generated or manipulated images, audio...

More Follow-On Lawsuits for Google Likely After Latest DMA Fine

Report from Reuters In Brief – European lawyers and litigation financiers say that the European Commission’s recent decision to fine Google $1 billion for violating the Digital Markets Act (DMA) may add to the wave of private antitrust lawsuits that the search giant...

More Really Smart Tech People Call for International AI Governance

Report from the Washington Post In Brief – OpenAI and Anthropic have endorsed a petition urging the US government to help create an international regime to slow down and regulate the pace of “automated AI development.” It is signed by over 1,200 “employees of frontier...

Judge Dismisses Google’s DMCA Search Scraping Lawsuit

Report from MediaPost In Brief – Federal District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers has dismissed Google's complaint against the Texas-based company SerpApi for allegedly violating the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) anti-circumvention provisions by evading...

Platform Economy Insights produces a short email four times a week that reviews two top stories with concise analysis. It is the best way to keep on top of the news you should know. Sign up for this free email here.

* indicates required